You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@cayenne.apache.org by Malcolm Edgar <ma...@gmail.com> on 2007/11/26 22:56:31 UTC

Cayenne 3.0M2 for Production

Hi All,

I would like to know peoples experience in using Cayenne 3.0M2 for
Production applications, or is Cayenne 2.0.x still the recommended release.

I am looking a upgrading our Cayenne 1.2.x applications.  By the way I like
the free search field in the Cayenne modeler.

regards Malcolm Edgar

Re: Cayenne 3.0M2 for Production

Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.

Yeah... Previously existing API that was not marked for deprecation  
should remain fairly stable. Runtime, while undergoing a number of  
changes, is still production quality. I am using it on a very active  
live site...

Essentially the biggest risk is that the _new_ API introduced during  
3.0 development cycle is not extensively tested just yet, and will be  
changing. So upgrades between milestones may not be just jar  
replacement. Here is one example - lifecycle callbacks. M3 will  
introduce CayenneModeler support for callbacks for the first time, but  
will also have changes to the manual callback API (using enums instead  
of int callback types).

Andrus

On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Tore Halset wrote:

> Hello.
>
> We are using M2 in production in a pretty busy system. We use only  
> the "classic cayenne" stuff, but it is working very well.
>
> Regards,
> - Tore.
>
> On Nov 26, 2007, at 22:56, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to know peoples experience in using Cayenne 3.0M2 for
>> Production applications, or is Cayenne 2.0.x still the recommended  
>> release.
>>
>> I am looking a upgrading our Cayenne 1.2.x applications.  By the  
>> way I like
>> the free search field in the Cayenne modeler.
>>
>> regards Malcolm Edgar
>
>

Re: Cayenne 3.0M2 for Production

Posted by Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>.

Hello.

We are using M2 in production in a pretty busy system. We use only the  
"classic cayenne" stuff, but it is working very well.

Regards,
  - Tore.

On Nov 26, 2007, at 22:56, Malcolm Edgar wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I would like to know peoples experience in using Cayenne 3.0M2 for
> Production applications, or is Cayenne 2.0.x still the recommended  
> release.
>
> I am looking a upgrading our Cayenne 1.2.x applications.  By the way  
> I like
> the free search field in the Cayenne modeler.
>
> regards Malcolm Edgar