You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "szaszm (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/02/28 20:08:27 UTC
[GitHub] [nifi-minifi-cpp] szaszm commented on a diff in pull request #1518: MINIFICPP-2057 Improve the performance of ListFile
szaszm commented on code in PR #1518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/1518#discussion_r1120710054
##########
extensions/standard-processors/processors/ListFile.h:
##########
@@ -81,19 +81,15 @@ class ListFile : public core::Processor {
private:
struct ListedFile : public utils::ListedObject {
[[nodiscard]] std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> getLastModified() const override {
- return std::chrono::time_point_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>(utils::file::FileUtils::to_sys(last_modified_time));
+ return last_modified_time;
}
[[nodiscard]] std::string getKey() const override {
- return absolute_path.string();
+ return full_file_path.string();
}
- std::filesystem::path filename;
- std::filesystem::path absolute_path;
- std::filesystem::file_time_type last_modified_time;
- std::filesystem::path relative_path;
+ std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock> last_modified_time;
Review Comment:
Does this change have any implications for reusing existing state from an older minifi version before the change? In other words, does this change the contents or the interpretation of the stored state?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org