You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mapreduce-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Allen Wittenauer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/10 03:54:40 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (MAPREDUCE-2083) Run partial reduce instead of combiner at reduce node to overlap shuffle delay with reduce

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Allen Wittenauer updated MAPREDUCE-2083:
----------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 0.20.2)

> Run partial reduce instead of combiner at reduce node to overlap shuffle delay with reduce
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAPREDUCE-2083
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2083
>             Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Faraz Ahmad
>
> Shuffle delays can be large for mapreductions with lots of intermediate data. Some of this shuffle delay can be overlapped with reduce if some of the reduce computation is started on partial intermediate data received by a reduce. Along these lines, the patch ??HADOOP-3226?? runs the combiner on the reduce side to prune the data that goes to reduce. However, ??HADOOP-3226?? does not achieve our goal of overlap with the shuffle because: 
> (1) In its original use of reducing intermediate data volume, the combiner falls in the critical path at the map side. Therefore, the combiner is usually a simple function which is too  lightweight in its new use to achieve sufficient overlap with the shuffle. 
> (2) Running the combiner  at the reduce side is helpful in overlapping with the shuffle only if  the combiner's functionality is a major portion of the reduce functionality --  otherwise running the combiner at the reduce side achieves only modest overlap with the shuffle. In many mapreductions, the combiner computation is often not part or only a small part of reduce computation. Addressing both these points, reduces that are complex often have heavier-weight computation than simple combining that can be overlapped with the shuffle. This heavy-weight computation is specified by a user-supplied "partial reduce" which performs the commutative/associative parts of reduce. The idea is to run partial reduce on subsets of intermediate data as they arrive at a reduce to  overlap with the shuffle, and then run the full-blown final reduce which re-reduces the partially-reduced data. Because the shuffle delay is large  for shuffle-heavy mapreductions, partial reduce that are heavier-weight than simple combiner can be hidden under the shuffle delay without extending the critical path of execution. 
> Finally, to further ensure that the partial reduce does not extend the critical path, we need to include two easily-tunable thresholds: One to start partial reduce only after enough intermediate data has been received (e.g. use mapred.inmem.merge.threshold or a separately defined parameter) so that we do not incur the overhead of invoking partial reduce on small data. Another threshold to stop partial reduce after most of the intermediate data has been received so that running partial reduce on the small remainder data does not delay starting final reduce.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)