You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@gmail.com> on 2005/06/20 20:01:30 UTC
javax POMs evangelism vote
Hi,
I've uploaded m2 poms for some javax apis under javax.whatever groupIds
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/
Related JIRA issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8
So if you could take a look to groupIds, artifactIds, and so and vote
if you agree.
About the servlet api, I've checked the one bundled with tomcat 5.5
and the version in the manifest is 2.4.public_draft, anyone knows if
there's a final one and where to get it? I haven't found it under
java.sun.com but seems there's a bunch of poms referencing servletapi
2.4.
and finally there's no deprecation information in the pom reference,
is it already planned? should I create a JIRA issue?
Regards
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: javax POMs evangelism vote
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@gmail.com>.
I've got good feedback from tomcat list. I'll fix the repo asap.
I've also created the deprecation jira issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-507
Regards
On 6/20/05, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> yes, you can, as these are only in m2.
>
> I would like:
> - to make the versions less complicated if we can.
> - to get sanctioned, distributable versions of servlet/jsp api from the
> tomcat dev team
>
> Carlos, could you do both of these?
>
> Once this is done, can you update the page on the main web site (I'll
> get you access), and publish with:
> maven -Dmaven.site.deploy.live=true site:deploy
> A blog might be a good idea too.
>
> Deprecation is a good idea. I had supersedes, but this is the opposite
> relatioship so should really have its own issue. Can you file it for beta-1?
>
> Thanks,
> Brett
>
> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> >I know, but if the author decides to use that version, what can we do?
> >for instance what do you suggest for the servlet api one? can't we use
> >2.4.public_draft as version?
> >
> >On 6/20/05, John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org> wrote:
> >
>
> > the only thing I'd mention is that from a repository management
> > perspective it has been useful to parse the filename into it's
> > constituent parts (artifactId, classifier, version, type,
> > etc.)...'.public_draft' as a version-part will wreak havoc with this at
> > present.
> >
> > It's along the same lines as the problems we've had with activemq and
> > geronimo in the m1->m2 conversion process...
> >
> > -j
> >
> > Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> >
> > >I've uploaded m2 poms for some javax apis under javax.whatever groupIds
> > >http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/
> > >Related JIRA issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8
> >
> > >So if you could take a look to groupIds, artifactIds, and so and vote
> > >if you agree.
> >
> > >About the servlet api, I've checked the one bundled with tomcat 5.5
> > >and the version in the manifest is 2.4.public_draft, anyone knows if
> > >there's a final one and where to get it? I haven't found it under
> > >java.sun.com but seems there's a bunch of poms referencing servletapi
> > >2.4.
> >
> > >and finally there's no deprecation information in the pom reference,
> > >is it already planned? should I create a JIRA issue?
> >
> > >Regards
> >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: javax POMs evangelism vote
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
yes, you can, as these are only in m2.
I would like:
- to make the versions less complicated if we can.
- to get sanctioned, distributable versions of servlet/jsp api from the
tomcat dev team
Carlos, could you do both of these?
Once this is done, can you update the page on the main web site (I'll
get you access), and publish with:
maven -Dmaven.site.deploy.live=true site:deploy
A blog might be a good idea too.
Deprecation is a good idea. I had supersedes, but this is the opposite
relatioship so should really have its own issue. Can you file it for beta-1?
Thanks,
Brett
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>I know, but if the author decides to use that version, what can we do?
>for instance what do you suggest for the servlet api one? can't we use
>2.4.public_draft as version?
>
>On 6/20/05, John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org> wrote:
>
> the only thing I'd mention is that from a repository management
> perspective it has been useful to parse the filename into it's
> constituent parts (artifactId, classifier, version, type,
> etc.)...'.public_draft' as a version-part will wreak havoc with this at
> present.
>
> It's along the same lines as the problems we've had with activemq and
> geronimo in the m1->m2 conversion process...
>
> -j
>
> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> >Hi,
>
> >I've uploaded m2 poms for some javax apis under javax.whatever groupIds
> >http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/
> >Related JIRA issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8
>
> >So if you could take a look to groupIds, artifactIds, and so and vote
> >if you agree.
>
> >About the servlet api, I've checked the one bundled with tomcat 5.5
> >and the version in the manifest is 2.4.public_draft, anyone knows if
> >there's a final one and where to get it? I haven't found it under
> >java.sun.com but seems there's a bunch of poms referencing servletapi
> >2.4.
>
> >and finally there's no deprecation information in the pom reference,
> >is it already planned? should I create a JIRA issue?
>
> >Regards
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: javax POMs evangelism vote
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@gmail.com>.
I know, but if the author decides to use that version, what can we do?
for instance what do you suggest for the servlet api one? can't we use
2.4.public_draft as version?
On 6/20/05, John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> the only thing I'd mention is that from a repository management
> perspective it has been useful to parse the filename into it's
> constituent parts (artifactId, classifier, version, type,
> etc.)...'.public_draft' as a version-part will wreak havoc with this at
> present.
>
> It's along the same lines as the problems we've had with activemq and
> geronimo in the m1->m2 conversion process...
>
> - -j
>
> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've uploaded m2 poms for some javax apis under javax.whatever groupIds
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/
> > Related JIRA issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8
> >
> > So if you could take a look to groupIds, artifactIds, and so and vote
> > if you agree.
> >
> > About the servlet api, I've checked the one bundled with tomcat 5.5
> > and the version in the manifest is 2.4.public_draft, anyone knows if
> > there's a final one and where to get it? I haven't found it under
> > java.sun.com but seems there's a bunch of poms referencing servletapi
> > 2.4.
> >
> > and finally there's no deprecation information in the pom reference,
> > is it already planned? should I create a JIRA issue?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCtx3KK3h2CZwO/4URAlxdAJ9/7uhcvOUUO2TPs5YFujRZkJc4AACgsWfT
> uPF07hHY8nggt0V8gMUTOYE=
> =wMOG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: javax POMs evangelism vote
Posted by John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
the only thing I'd mention is that from a repository management
perspective it has been useful to parse the filename into it's
constituent parts (artifactId, classifier, version, type,
etc.)...'.public_draft' as a version-part will wreak havoc with this at
present.
It's along the same lines as the problems we've had with activemq and
geronimo in the m1->m2 conversion process...
- -j
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded m2 poms for some javax apis under javax.whatever groupIds
> http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/
> Related JIRA issue is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8
>
> So if you could take a look to groupIds, artifactIds, and so and vote
> if you agree.
>
> About the servlet api, I've checked the one bundled with tomcat 5.5
> and the version in the manifest is 2.4.public_draft, anyone knows if
> there's a final one and where to get it? I haven't found it under
> java.sun.com but seems there's a bunch of poms referencing servletapi
> 2.4.
>
> and finally there's no deprecation information in the pom reference,
> is it already planned? should I create a JIRA issue?
>
> Regards
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCtx3KK3h2CZwO/4URAlxdAJ9/7uhcvOUUO2TPs5YFujRZkJc4AACgsWfT
uPF07hHY8nggt0V8gMUTOYE=
=wMOG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org