You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sis.apache.org by Martin Desruisseaux <ma...@geomatys.fr> on 2013/07/01 18:40:07 UTC
Should we deprecate LatLon, LatLonRadius and LatLonRect?
As part of SIS-68 and SIS-69 tasks, I refactored the LatLon,
LatLonRadius and LatLonRect classes as subclasses of DirectPosition and
Envelope implementations, which are the OGC/ISO objects. This is
following up on an email discussion we had a few months ago. Should we
deprecate those classes before 0.3 release, in order to replace them by
direct usage of ISO/OGC classes in SIS 0.4?
Martin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-68
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-69
Re: Should we deprecate LatLon, LatLonRadius and LatLonRect?
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Yep, deprecating makes a ton of sense, or removing them.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Desruisseaux <ma...@geomatys.fr>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "dev@sis.apache.org" <de...@sis.apache.org>
Date: Monday, July 1, 2013 9:40 AM
To: Apache SIS <de...@sis.apache.org>
Subject: Should we deprecate LatLon, LatLonRadius and LatLonRect?
>As part of SIS-68 and SIS-69 tasks, I refactored the LatLon,
>LatLonRadius and LatLonRect classes as subclasses of DirectPosition and
>Envelope implementations, which are the OGC/ISO objects. This is
>following up on an email discussion we had a few months ago. Should we
>deprecate those classes before 0.3 release, in order to replace them by
>direct usage of ISO/OGC classes in SIS 0.4?
>
> Martin
>
>
>[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-68
>[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-69
>