You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com> on 2004/08/17 23:27:36 UTC

PLEASE REVIEW - Proposed Fix for Return-Path handling (subsumes JAMES-264 mail loop)

> > the root of the problem, the usage of Return-Path header
> > will still be in the code
>
> That is what I've been looking at today.  It is a riskier
> change to make on a point release, but might be worthwhile.

I need to test this, and haven't even started.  But I'd like to get as many
eyes on this as possible.

	--- Noel