You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at> on 2008/08/15 19:29:48 UTC
Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4 involved
major changes (see
http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
permission to do so (my username is msparer).
thanks in advance
regards,
Michael
-----
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19002588.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Rodolfo Hansen <rh...@kindleit.net>.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>wrote:
>
> I looked a bit more into the code and came to the conclusion that having to
> depend on the order the servlets and services are loaded is kind of a Bad
> Thing (tm). A user shouldn't have to care about such things. I had a look
> at
> the CometdService and I think one could circumvent the problem if we use
> the
> CometdService as a facade to the BayeuxService (rather than a subclass).
> This way we could initialise the BayeuxService lazily (which will be on
> first subscription to a channel) and wouln't have to depend on servlet
> orders or the time the ServletContext gets initialised. And as the only two
> methods used from the Bayeuxservice are getClient() and getBayeux() it
> wouldn't be too difficult. What do you, wicketstuff-push-commiters, or
> Rodolfo, think about that? Wouldn't be work at all for you as I have commit
> access - but I rather ask you first as you did the upgrade to 1.3.4 ;-)
Yes, that is the better option.
I'm still in a bit in a hurry to get the RemoveListener functionality for
another project I was working on.
>
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
> Michael Sparer wrote:
> >
> >> 2. The CometD servlet now has to be loaded before the CometDService can
> >> be
> >> instanciated.
> >> So you would have to initialize it on demand in your application.
> >
> > I ran into that this morning. Can't this be avoided? I didn't look into
> > the code thoroughly yet, but I saw that CometdService is now extending
> > jetty's Bayeux Service which needs the Bayeux in the constructor. Having
> > the ServletContext initialised at the time my Beans are instantiated is
> > kinda tricky for me, as I can't initialise the services lazily as there
> is
> > a whole lot of cross-dependencies.
> > I could do it the hard way and remove the service from my springcontext,
> > let it be instantiated by the application and add the application as
> > reference-bean to the services that formerly needed the ChannelService -
> > but this sounds like a workaround, doesn't it?
> > When jetty implemented their new BayeuxService they must have thought
> > about such a problem, haven't they?
> > How did you go about this?
> >
> > regards,
> > Michael
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Michael Sparer
> > <mi...@gmx.at>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
> >> involved
> >> major changes (see
> >> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far
> as
> >> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
> >> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
> >> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
> >> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
> >> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
> >>
> >> thanks in advance
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Michael
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Michael Sparer
> >> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19002588.html
> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19029986.html
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>.
I looked a bit more into the code and came to the conclusion that having to
depend on the order the servlets and services are loaded is kind of a Bad
Thing (tm). A user shouldn't have to care about such things. I had a look at
the CometdService and I think one could circumvent the problem if we use the
CometdService as a facade to the BayeuxService (rather than a subclass).
This way we could initialise the BayeuxService lazily (which will be on
first subscription to a channel) and wouln't have to depend on servlet
orders or the time the ServletContext gets initialised. And as the only two
methods used from the Bayeuxservice are getClient() and getBayeux() it
wouldn't be too difficult. What do you, wicketstuff-push-commiters, or
Rodolfo, think about that? Wouldn't be work at all for you as I have commit
access - but I rather ask you first as you did the upgrade to 1.3.4 ;-)
regards,
Michael
Michael Sparer wrote:
>
>> 2. The CometD servlet now has to be loaded before the CometDService can
>> be
>> instanciated.
>> So you would have to initialize it on demand in your application.
>
> I ran into that this morning. Can't this be avoided? I didn't look into
> the code thoroughly yet, but I saw that CometdService is now extending
> jetty's Bayeux Service which needs the Bayeux in the constructor. Having
> the ServletContext initialised at the time my Beans are instantiated is
> kinda tricky for me, as I can't initialise the services lazily as there is
> a whole lot of cross-dependencies.
> I could do it the hard way and remove the service from my springcontext,
> let it be instantiated by the application and add the application as
> reference-bean to the services that formerly needed the ChannelService -
> but this sounds like a workaround, doesn't it?
> When jetty implemented their new BayeuxService they must have thought
> about such a problem, haven't they?
> How did you go about this?
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Michael Sparer
> <mi...@gmx.at>wrote:
>
>>
>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>> involved
>> major changes (see
>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> -----
>> Michael Sparer
>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19002588.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
-----
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19029986.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>.
> 2. The CometD servlet now has to be loaded before the CometDService can be
> instanciated.
> So you would have to initialize it on demand in your application.
I ran into that this morning. Can't this be avoided? I didn't look into the
code thoroughly yet, but I saw that CometdService is now extending jetty's
Bayeux Service which needs the Bayeux in the constructor. Having the
ServletContext initialised at the time my Beans are instantiated is kinda
tricky for me, as I can't initialise the services lazily as there is a whole
lot of cross-dependencies.
I could do it the hard way and remove the service from my springcontext, let
it be instantiated by the application and add the application as
reference-bean to the services that formerly needed the ChannelService - but
this sounds like a workaround, doesn't it?
When jetty implemented their new BayeuxService they must have thought about
such a problem, haven't they?
How did you go about this?
regards,
Michael
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Michael Sparer
<mi...@gmx.at>wrote:
>
> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
> involved
> major changes (see
> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>
> thanks in advance
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19002588.html
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
-----
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19027990.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Rodolfo Hansen <rh...@kindleit.net>.
No problem.
The 1.3.4 version is working well right now. The usage is almost exactly the
same as before, except for two points:
1. There no longer is a dependency to wicketstuff-dojo, if your project has
one you need to mark is specifically. I don't know what issues may arise by
having to dojo.js files loaded, I do know both versions are incompatible.
2. The CometD servlet now has to be loaded before the CometDService can be
instanciated.
So you would have to initialize it on demand in your application.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>wrote:
>
> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4 involved
> major changes (see
> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>
> thanks in advance
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19002588.html
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Hehe.
Det var så lidt:)
Michael Sparer wrote:
> Alright it works, just did the branch - thanks a lot or "tak" as a friend
> told me to say ;-)
>
>
> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
>> No that's enough for me. youre in on sourceforge, please say if you want
>> permissions for jira etc..:)
>>
>>
>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>
>>> Actually I wrote to Vincent Demay (who is the original author of the push
>>> project) some weeks ago about a slight change but never received an
>>> answer.
>>> His last commit also was some time ago (like a year or so) - if you feel
>>> unsure about granting me permission, I could give you the version number
>>> and
>>> you perform the branch, that's no problem for me and I also wouldn't feel
>>> offended ;-)
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Im not sure but did you get the authors blessing or are he emeritus?
>>>>
>>>> If true then i'll go ahead and grant permissions:)
>>>>
>>>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nope, I don't think so. If I got, I wasn't told :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> did you get permission for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>>>>>>> involved
>>>>>>> major changes (see
>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major
>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>>>>>>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch.
>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>>>>>>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks in advance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>> Michael Sparer
>>>>>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -Wicket for love
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>>>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>>>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>>>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Michael Sparer
>>>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Wicket for love
>>>>
>>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -----
>>> Michael Sparer
>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> -Wicket for love
>>
>> Nino Martinez Wael
>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>> http://www.jayway.dk
>> +45 2936 7684
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>.
Alright it works, just did the branch - thanks a lot or "tak" as a friend
told me to say ;-)
Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
> No that's enough for me. youre in on sourceforge, please say if you want
> permissions for jira etc..:)
>
>
> Michael Sparer wrote:
>> Actually I wrote to Vincent Demay (who is the original author of the push
>> project) some weeks ago about a slight change but never received an
>> answer.
>> His last commit also was some time ago (like a year or so) - if you feel
>> unsure about granting me permission, I could give you the version number
>> and
>> you perform the branch, that's no problem for me and I also wouldn't feel
>> offended ;-)
>>
>> regards,
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>>
>>> Im not sure but did you get the authors blessing or are he emeritus?
>>>
>>> If true then i'll go ahead and grant permissions:)
>>>
>>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nope, I don't think so. If I got, I wasn't told :-)
>>>>
>>>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> did you get permission for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>>>>>> involved
>>>>>> major changes (see
>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major
>>>>>> API
>>>>>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>>>>>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch.
>>>>>> So
>>>>>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>>>>>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks in advance
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> Michael Sparer
>>>>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -Wicket for love
>>>>>
>>>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Michael Sparer
>>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> -Wicket for love
>>>
>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Michael Sparer
>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> http://www.jayway.dk
> +45 2936 7684
>
>
>
-----
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19028556.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
No that's enough for me. youre in on sourceforge, please say if you want
permissions for jira etc..:)
Michael Sparer wrote:
> Actually I wrote to Vincent Demay (who is the original author of the push
> project) some weeks ago about a slight change but never received an answer.
> His last commit also was some time ago (like a year or so) - if you feel
> unsure about granting me permission, I could give you the version number and
> you perform the branch, that's no problem for me and I also wouldn't feel
> offended ;-)
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
>
> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
>> Im not sure but did you get the authors blessing or are he emeritus?
>>
>> If true then i'll go ahead and grant permissions:)
>>
>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>
>>> Nope, I don't think so. If I got, I wasn't told :-)
>>>
>>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> did you get permission for this?
>>>>
>>>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>>>>> involved
>>>>> major changes (see
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far
>>>>> as
>>>>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
>>>>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>>>>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
>>>>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>>>>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks in advance
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Michael Sparer
>>>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Wicket for love
>>>>
>>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -----
>>> Michael Sparer
>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> -Wicket for love
>>
>> Nino Martinez Wael
>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>> http://www.jayway.dk
>> +45 2936 7684
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>.
Actually I wrote to Vincent Demay (who is the original author of the push
project) some weeks ago about a slight change but never received an answer.
His last commit also was some time ago (like a year or so) - if you feel
unsure about granting me permission, I could give you the version number and
you perform the branch, that's no problem for me and I also wouldn't feel
offended ;-)
regards,
Michael
Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
> Im not sure but did you get the authors blessing or are he emeritus?
>
> If true then i'll go ahead and grant permissions:)
>
> Michael Sparer wrote:
>> Nope, I don't think so. If I got, I wasn't told :-)
>>
>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>>
>>> did you get permission for this?
>>>
>>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>>
>>>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>>>> involved
>>>> major changes (see
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far
>>>> as
>>>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
>>>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>>>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
>>>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>>>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Michael Sparer
>>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> -Wicket for love
>>>
>>> Nino Martinez Wael
>>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>>> http://www.jayway.dk
>>> +45 2936 7684
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Michael Sparer
>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> http://www.jayway.dk
> +45 2936 7684
>
>
>
-----
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19028034.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Im not sure but did you get the authors blessing or are he emeritus?
If true then i'll go ahead and grant permissions:)
Michael Sparer wrote:
> Nope, I don't think so. If I got, I wasn't told :-)
>
> Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
>> did you get permission for this?
>>
>> Michael Sparer wrote:
>>
>>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>>> involved
>>> major changes (see
>>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
>>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
>>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
>>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>>
>>> thanks in advance
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Michael Sparer
>>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> -Wicket for love
>>
>> Nino Martinez Wael
>> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
>> http://www.jayway.dk
>> +45 2936 7684
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Michael Sparer <mi...@gmx.at>.
Nope, I don't think so. If I got, I wasn't told :-)
Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
> did you get permission for this?
>
> Michael Sparer wrote:
>> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4
>> involved
>> major changes (see
>> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
>> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
>> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
>> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
>> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
>> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> -----
>> Michael Sparer
>> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>>
>
> --
> -Wicket for love
>
> Nino Martinez Wael
> Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
> http://www.jayway.dk
> +45 2936 7684
>
>
>
-----
Michael Sparer
http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Permission-for-branching-wicketstuff-push-tp19002588p19027831.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Permission for branching wicketstuff-push
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
did you get permission for this?
Michael Sparer wrote:
> As the recent change from wicketstuff-push 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 1.3.4 involved
> major changes (see
> http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-update-to18765345.html) as far as
> dependencies are concerned (new version of jetty-cometd with major API
> changes), I'd suggest a 1.3.0 branch.
> I do have commit rights but don't have permission to do the branch. So
> please either branch wicketstuff-push from version 3267 or give me
> permission to do so (my username is msparer).
>
> thanks in advance
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
> -----
> Michael Sparer
> http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com
>
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684