You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/08/21 00:09:12 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on pull request #37261: GH-37239: [Ruby] Updated documentation for ArrowTable#initialize to clarify argument details

conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #37261:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/37261#issuecomment-1685435165

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 6357c9f2419d5b0717e62adc8233c649e10de34b.
   
   There were 4 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-08-20 21:29:36Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/d8107c19faab444f9a8027e187799c13...d56c67fe99ff4cad9e77bd76f0142402/)
     - [`file-read` (R) with compression=uncompressed, dataset=fanniemae_2016Q4, file_type=feather, language=R, output_type=dataframe](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064dfedd82207cbb80007b167a1d4399...064e297dbf707651800051ef05723a20)
     - [`file-read` (Python) with compression=uncompressed, dataset=fanniemae_2016Q4, file_type=feather, output_type=table](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064dfe9127047eec80002967dd39a99e...064e2931409d72ed800011d1969daca3)
   - and 2 more (see the report linked below)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/16051548658) has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org