You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by "Mike Drob (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/06/22 23:54:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3912) Random walk sets random config
on default namespace
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596726#comment-14596726 ]
Mike Drob commented on ACCUMULO-3912:
-------------------------------------
As a broader issue, would it make sense to place random-walk and continuous-ingest and whatever else to "test" table namespace?
> Random walk sets random config on default namespace
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-3912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3912
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Keith Turner
>
> While running random walk test for 1.6.3, the following failure happened.
> {noformat}
> Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Props not equals ST_index_worker4_3842_1435004444639 ST_index_worker4_3842_1435004444639_tmp
> at org.apache.accumulo.test.randomwalk.shard.ExportIndex.visit(ExportIndex.java:106)
> {noformat}
> I looked at the two tables config in the shell and found the following property differed.
> {noformat}
> default | table.compaction.minor.idle ............... | 5m
> default | table.compaction.minor.logs.threshold ..... | 3
> {noformat}
> The _tmp table had the following setting.
> {noformat}
> default | table.compaction.minor.idle ............... | 5m
> table | @override .............................. | 178299085
> default | table.compaction.minor.logs.threshold ..... | 3
> {noformat}
> I grepped all the random walkers logs and found the following :
> {noformat}
> [11] 21:18:42 [SUCCESS] worker0
> 22 20:33:57,007 [concurrent.Config] DEBUG: Setting table.compaction.minor.idle on namespace to 178299085
> {noformat}
> So {{concurrent.Config}} updated props on a random namepace and caused the shard test to fail, it should not do this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)