You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by ds...@apache.org on 2022/03/27 16:14:28 UTC
svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Author: dsahlberg
Date: Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
New Revision: 1899247
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899247&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: 1.13.x is end of life (2019-10-30 + 6 months < $TODAY)
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS?rev=1899247&r1=1899246&r2=1899247&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
- * THIS RELEASE STREAM IS OPEN FOR STABILIZATION. *
+ * THIS RELEASE STREAM IS CLOSED: SUPERSEDED BY 1.14. *
* *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:01:26 +0200:
> Den mån 28 mars 2022 kl 02:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> > > I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> > > probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
> > > sections doesn't look nice.
> >
> > All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
> > a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
> > it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
> >
>
> #todo is used in several other places. I don't know if we have specific CSS
> for <del>.
>
> This was a little bit of a flame bait to see if anyone else has an opinion
> on the <del>eted table.
I was referring to .divider, .task-level-1, and .in-progress, which were
used to create a table with headers within the table. They are still
defined in our CSS, but now there's no example of their use. Sorry for
the unclarity.
Cheers,
Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:01:26 +0200:
> Den mån 28 mars 2022 kl 02:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> > Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> > > I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> > > probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
> > > sections doesn't look nice.
> >
> > All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
> > a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
> > it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
> >
>
> #todo is used in several other places. I don't know if we have specific CSS
> for <del>.
>
> This was a little bit of a flame bait to see if anyone else has an opinion
> on the <del>eted table.
I was referring to .divider, .task-level-1, and .in-progress, which were
used to create a table with headers within the table. They are still
defined in our CSS, but now there's no example of their use. Sorry for
the unclarity.
Cheers,
Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den mån 28 mars 2022 kl 02:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <
> d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> >
> >> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
> >> <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
> >> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
> >>
> >
> > Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be
> merged
> > right away. Thanks for pointing out!
> >
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> I wonder whether we should add "1.15.x | Not yet supported" to that table.
>
-0: 1.15 doesn't even exist yet and /trunk is never "supported". I think
we can add it when we branch.
> I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> > probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
> > sections doesn't look nice.
>
> All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
> a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
> it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
>
#todo is used in several other places. I don't know if we have specific CSS
for <del>.
This was a little bit of a flame bait to see if anyone else has an opinion
on the <del>eted table.
Kind regards,
Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den mån 28 mars 2022 kl 02:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <
> d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> >
> >> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
> >> <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
> >> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
> >>
> >
> > Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be
> merged
> > right away. Thanks for pointing out!
> >
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> I wonder whether we should add "1.15.x | Not yet supported" to that table.
>
-0: 1.15 doesn't even exist yet and /trunk is never "supported". I think
we can add it when we branch.
> I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> > probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
> > sections doesn't look nice.
>
> All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
> a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
> it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
>
#todo is used in several other places. I don't know if we have specific CSS
for <del>.
This was a little bit of a flame bait to see if anyone else has an opinion
on the <del>eted table.
Kind regards,
Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
>
>> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
>> <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
>> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
>>
>
> Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be merged
> right away. Thanks for pointing out!
>
Thanks for fixing it.
I wonder whether we should add "1.15.x | Not yet supported" to that table.
> I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
> sections doesn't look nice.
All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
Cheers,
Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00:
> Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
>
>> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
>> <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
>> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
>>
>
> Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be merged
> right away. Thanks for pointing out!
>
Thanks for fixing it.
I wonder whether we should add "1.15.x | Not yet supported" to that table.
> I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
> probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
> sections doesn't look nice.
All I have to say is that it'd be nice to keep somewhere either
a working example of those CSS classes or documentation of them… even if
it's just "Refer to roadmap.html@r1899267" :-)
Cheers,
Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
> <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
>
Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be merged
right away. Thanks for pointing out!
I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
sections doesn't look nice.
/Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
> <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
>
Done (r1899267). This should be quite straight forward and could be merged
right away. Thanks for pointing out!
I also made some additional changes in roadmap.html (r1899268). This could
probably be discussed a bit more but the "out of date" and <del>eted
sections doesn't look nice.
/Daniel
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
<https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
dsahlberg@apache.org wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:14 +00:00:
> Author: dsahlberg
> Date: Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
> New Revision: 1899247
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899247&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: 1.13.x is end of life (2019-10-30 + 6 months < $TODAY)
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS?rev=1899247&r1=1899246&r2=1899247&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * *
> - * THIS RELEASE STREAM IS OPEN FOR STABILIZATION. *
> + * THIS RELEASE STREAM IS CLOSED: SUPERSEDED BY 1.14. *
> * *
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in
<https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/#supported-versions>;
anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.)
dsahlberg@apache.org wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:14 +00:00:
> Author: dsahlberg
> Date: Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
> New Revision: 1899247
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899247&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: 1.13.x is end of life (2019-10-30 + 6 months < $TODAY)
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS?rev=1899247&r1=1899246&r2=1899247&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS Sun Mar 27 16:14:27 2022
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * *
> - * THIS RELEASE STREAM IS OPEN FOR STABILIZATION. *
> + * THIS RELEASE STREAM IS CLOSED: SUPERSEDED BY 1.14. *
> * *
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *