You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Francois Saint-Jacques (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/22 15:59:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (ARROW-6183) [R] Document that you don't have to use tidyselect if you don't want

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Francois Saint-Jacques resolved ARROW-6183.
-------------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 0.15.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Issue resolved by pull request 5144
[https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5144]

> [R] Document that you don't have to use tidyselect if you don't want
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-6183
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6183
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: R
>            Reporter: James Lamb
>            Assignee: Neal Richardson
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 0.15.0
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I noticed tonight that several functions from the *tidyselect* package are re-exported by *arrow*. Why is this necessary? In my opinion, the *arrow* R package should strive to have as few dependencies as possible and should have no opinion about which parts of the R ecosystem ("tidy" or otherwise) are used with it.
> I think it would be valuable to cut the *tidyselect* re-exports, and to make *feather::read_feather()*'s argument *col_select* take a character vector of column names instead of a "*tidyselect::vars_select()"* object. I think that would be more natural and would be intuitive for a broader group of R users.
> Would you be open to removing *tidyselect* and changing *feather::read_feather()* this way?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)