You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "John E. Conlon" <jc...@verticon.com> on 2006/02/02 02:00:08 UTC

Re: Contribution of the dependency manager to Feli

Thanks!

- John

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 01:55, Peter Neubauer wrote:
> Yes,
> I think that is a very good fit. Will check with the other developers here ...
> 
> /peter
> -----Original message-----
> From: Niclas Hedhman niclas@hedhman.org
> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:24:18 +0100
> To: felix-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Contribution of the dependency manager to Feli
> 
> > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 07:13, John E. Conlon wrote:
> > > Your right, one can always get the dictionary from the Configuration and
> > > the Configuration does provide some utility methods for getting typed
> > > values, but I don't think I communicated very well my concern.
> > 
> > Perhaps one can provide the Configuration class as a utility.
> > 
> > public void update( Dictionary rawConfig )
> >     throws Exception
> > {
> >     Configuration config = new Configuration( rawConfig );
> >     :
> > }
> > 
> > or something, and both camps could live happily together.
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Niclas
> > 
> > 
> > 
>