You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by "potiuk (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/07/16 05:29:14 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on a diff in pull request #32629: Add option for storing configuration description in providers

potiuk commented on code in PR #32629:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32629#discussion_r1264610191


##########
airflow/provider.yaml.schema.json:
##########


Review Comment:
   Yep. It had inconsistent indentation to begin with so I re-indented it to be fully consistent. I could separate it out like "indent those provider.json.schemas". but I figured that with such a big addition it makes sense to do it in one PR - especially that it has very little "code" in them - it's merely a description that is used to validate the real code.
   
   Do you think it's better to split it ? I am happy to do it if you think it makes sense @uranusjr :)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org