You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/04 09:18:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-4461) Remove fallbacks for service users resolution

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14346587#comment-14346587 ] 

Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-4461:
-----------------------------------------

Apart from the problem mentioned, with SLING-4321we have another problem related to the fallback: the reference to the registered service usually targets the subservice via  target=(subServiceName=foo) . However with the fallback in place, such a service must not exist. This could be solved by specifying a more complex target for the reference like "|((!(subServiceName=*))(subServiceName=foo))".


> Remove fallbacks for service users resolution
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-4461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4461
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Service User Mapper
>            Reporter: Marius Petria
>             Fix For: Service User Mapper 1.1.2
>
>
> ServiceUserMapperImpl has several levels of fallback for service user resolution (fallback to bundle default, or to global default). While this offers a lot of flexibility, it introduces non-determinism in a security feature. If defaults are set, it can happen (especially at startup) that code is executed using different serviceUsers, e.g. a component can execute using the bundle default or global default until its specific subService is available, and it can be easily imagined how this can cause subtle errors.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)