You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ilya Kasnacheev (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/29 10:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-7556) Docs should feature specifying SQL key more prominently

Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-7556:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: Docs should feature specifying SQL key more prominently
                 Key: IGNITE-7556
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7556
             Project: Ignite
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: documentation
            Reporter: Ilya Kasnacheev


Descriptions on [https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/schema-and-indexes] are not DML-friendly
After reading this page and [https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/insert], one would likely still unable to write working INSERT because there won't be primary key in it.

Their only chance is to spot _key reference in infoblock, or infer usability of setKeyFields() with single key type. Both are unlikely, leading to questions such as [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48460214/how-do-i-read-data-from-ignite-kv-storage-using-jdbc] see {{Key is missing from query}}

Such problems are hard to debug. They can be avoided if all examples of QueryEntities in docs will contain setKeyFields, and INSERT docs page will refer to _key field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)