You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@whirr.apache.org by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> on 2011/10/19 19:56:42 UTC
New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new cloud
provider should be quite easy.
Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
-- Andrei Savu
Re: New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Posted by Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Andrei.
-A
P.s. You can get private ip addresses in CloudSigma, just it isn't by
default.
On Oct 20, 2011 5:26 AM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have tried to run a Zookeeper cluster with Whirr on cloudsigma-lvs.
> The bootstrap phase works as expected but I got this exception:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: index (0)
> must be less than size (0)
> at
>
> com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkElementIndex(Preconditions.java:301)
> at
>
> com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkElementIndex(Preconditions.java:280)
> at com.google.common.collect.Iterables.get(Iterables.java:709)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction$1.apply(BootstrapClusterAction.java:146)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction$1.apply(BootstrapClusterAction.java:143)
> at com.google.common.collect.Iterators$8.next(Iterators.java:782)
> at java.util.AbstractCollection.addAll(AbstractCollection.java:305)
> at java.util.LinkedHashSet.<init>(LinkedHashSet.java:152)
> at com.google.common.collect.Sets.newLinkedHashSet(Sets.java:264)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction.getInstances(BootstrapClusterAction.java:142)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction.doAction(BootstrapClusterAction.java:132)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.actions.ScriptBasedClusterAction.execute(ScriptBasedClusterAction.java:81)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.ClusterController.launchCluster(ClusterController.java:105)
> at
>
> org.apache.whirr.cli.command.LaunchClusterCommand.run(LaunchClusterCommand.java:62)
> at org.apache.whirr.cli.Main.run(Main.java:64)
> at org.apache.whirr.cli.Main.main(Main.java:97)
>
> This is happening because a VM has only a public IP by default.
>
> [id=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d,
> providerId=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d, group=zookeeper,
> name=zookeeper-413, location=[id=cloudsigma-lvs, scope=PROVIDER,
> description=https://api.lvs.cloudsigma.com, parent=null,
> iso3166Codes=[US-NV], metadata={}], uri=null, imageId=null, os=[name=Ubuntu
> 10.04 Linux Server Edition 64bit Preinstalled System with automated SSH
> Access, family=ubuntu, version=10.04, arch=null, is64Bit=false,
> description=This is a ready server system drive which offers automated SSH
> access using the VNC password for initial SSH access.], state=RUNNING,
> loginPort=22, hostname=null, privateAddresses=[],
> publicAddresses=[69.194.139.16],
> hardware=[id=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d,
> providerId=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d, name=null,
> processors=[[cores=1.0, speed=1000.0]], ram=1024, volumes=[[[id=null,
> type=NAS, size=null, device=null, durable=true, isBootDevice=false]]],
> supportsImage=ALWAYS_TRUE, tags=[]], loginUser=root, userMetadata={},
> tags=[]]
>
> I have created this JIRA issue for changing the code to make it work when a
> VM has only a public IP.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-406
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Try it!
> >
> > I have a test account.
> > -A
> > On Oct 19, 2011 3:58 PM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > A 10GE network sounds really good for Hadoop clusters. How good is IO
> > > performance?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't think KT support is ready. Maybe one of the others? How
> about
> > > > cloudsigma-lvs? It has 10GE and fast starting cheap servers.
> > > >
> > > > -Adrian
> > > > On Oct 19, 2011 10:57 AM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new
> cloud
> > > > > provider should be quite easy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Andrei Savu
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
I have tried to run a Zookeeper cluster with Whirr on cloudsigma-lvs.
The bootstrap phase works as expected but I got this exception:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: index (0)
must be less than size (0)
at
com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkElementIndex(Preconditions.java:301)
at
com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkElementIndex(Preconditions.java:280)
at com.google.common.collect.Iterables.get(Iterables.java:709)
at
org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction$1.apply(BootstrapClusterAction.java:146)
at
org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction$1.apply(BootstrapClusterAction.java:143)
at com.google.common.collect.Iterators$8.next(Iterators.java:782)
at java.util.AbstractCollection.addAll(AbstractCollection.java:305)
at java.util.LinkedHashSet.<init>(LinkedHashSet.java:152)
at com.google.common.collect.Sets.newLinkedHashSet(Sets.java:264)
at
org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction.getInstances(BootstrapClusterAction.java:142)
at
org.apache.whirr.actions.BootstrapClusterAction.doAction(BootstrapClusterAction.java:132)
at
org.apache.whirr.actions.ScriptBasedClusterAction.execute(ScriptBasedClusterAction.java:81)
at
org.apache.whirr.ClusterController.launchCluster(ClusterController.java:105)
at
org.apache.whirr.cli.command.LaunchClusterCommand.run(LaunchClusterCommand.java:62)
at org.apache.whirr.cli.Main.run(Main.java:64)
at org.apache.whirr.cli.Main.main(Main.java:97)
This is happening because a VM has only a public IP by default.
[id=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d,
providerId=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d, group=zookeeper,
name=zookeeper-413, location=[id=cloudsigma-lvs, scope=PROVIDER,
description=https://api.lvs.cloudsigma.com, parent=null,
iso3166Codes=[US-NV], metadata={}], uri=null, imageId=null, os=[name=Ubuntu
10.04 Linux Server Edition 64bit Preinstalled System with automated SSH
Access, family=ubuntu, version=10.04, arch=null, is64Bit=false,
description=This is a ready server system drive which offers automated SSH
access using the VNC password for initial SSH access.], state=RUNNING,
loginPort=22, hostname=null, privateAddresses=[],
publicAddresses=[69.194.139.16],
hardware=[id=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d,
providerId=5483af12-6544-4d85-b495-9506c04f244d, name=null,
processors=[[cores=1.0, speed=1000.0]], ram=1024, volumes=[[[id=null,
type=NAS, size=null, device=null, durable=true, isBootDevice=false]]],
supportsImage=ALWAYS_TRUE, tags=[]], loginUser=root, userMetadata={},
tags=[]]
I have created this JIRA issue for changing the code to make it work when a
VM has only a public IP.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-406
-- Andrei Savu
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try it!
>
> I have a test account.
> -A
> On Oct 19, 2011 3:58 PM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A 10GE network sounds really good for Hadoop clusters. How good is IO
> > performance?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think KT support is ready. Maybe one of the others? How about
> > > cloudsigma-lvs? It has 10GE and fast starting cheap servers.
> > >
> > > -Adrian
> > > On Oct 19, 2011 10:57 AM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new cloud
> > > > provider should be quite easy.
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
> > > >
> > > > -- Andrei Savu
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Posted by Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>.
Try it!
I have a test account.
-A
On Oct 19, 2011 3:58 PM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A 10GE network sounds really good for Hadoop clusters. How good is IO
> performance?
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't think KT support is ready. Maybe one of the others? How about
> > cloudsigma-lvs? It has 10GE and fast starting cheap servers.
> >
> > -Adrian
> > On Oct 19, 2011 10:57 AM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new cloud
> > > provider should be quite easy.
> > >
> > > Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
> > >
> > > -- Andrei Savu
> > >
> >
>
Re: New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Posted by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com>.
A 10GE network sounds really good for Hadoop clusters. How good is IO
performance?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think KT support is ready. Maybe one of the others? How about
> cloudsigma-lvs? It has 10GE and fast starting cheap servers.
>
> -Adrian
> On Oct 19, 2011 10:57 AM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new cloud
> > provider should be quite easy.
> >
> > Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
> >
> > -- Andrei Savu
> >
>
Re: New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Posted by Adrian Cole <fe...@gmail.com>.
I don't think KT support is ready. Maybe one of the others? How about
cloudsigma-lvs? It has 10GE and fast starting cheap servers.
-Adrian
On Oct 19, 2011 10:57 AM, "Andrei Savu" <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new cloud
> provider should be quite easy.
>
> Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
Re: New cloud provider for 0.7.0?
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Hi, we're not ready yet.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that WHIRR-325 is in I think that adding support for a new cloud
> provider should be quite easy.
>
> Any suggestion? Edward are you using Whirr inside the KT cloud?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon