You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@bookkeeper.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2017/11/22 22:40:11 UTC

[GitHub] sijie opened a new issue #762: Codahale and Prometheus stats providers should be in a different package name

sijie opened a new issue #762: Codahale and Prometheus stats providers should be in a different package name
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/762
 
 
   
   **FEATURE REQUEST**
   
   1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
   
   Codahale and Prometheus stats providers are sharing same package name with the stats library `org.apache.bookkeeper.stats`. We should consider moving them to their own package name.
   
   Codahale => `org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.codahale`
   Prometheus => `org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.prometheus`
   
   For BC concerns, we need to do this in two phases:
   
   - in 4.7, we copy the files but still have the old files for BC. but mark the old classes as deprecated.
   - in 4.8, we remove the old files.
   
   because the class names are used for reflection.
   
   2. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
   
   *should-have*
   
   3. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
   
   N/A
   
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services