You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by John Vines <vi...@apache.org> on 2014/04/04 19:54:04 UTC
[DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly moving
forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop community,
hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and with that
I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to support
both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for future
releases?
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
Yes, I had assumed that all versions that support hadoop1 will continue.
Only for major releases (1.x, or x if we pick up semantic versioning or
something else)
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>
> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we drop
> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>
> -Sean
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
> > moving
> > > forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
> > community,
> > > hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and with
> > that
> > > I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
> support
> > > both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
> > >
> > > What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
> > future
> > > releases?
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
I would be comfortable calling Hadoop 1 support in 1.6.0 deprecated.
-Sean
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>
> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
> >
> > I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
> drop
> > it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
> > and 1.6 have been EOLd?
> >
> > -Sean
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
> > > moving
> > > > forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
> > > community,
> > > > hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
> with
> > > that
> > > > I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
> > support
> > > > both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
> > > >
> > > > What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
> > > future
> > > > releases?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>
--
Sean
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
Yes. It would mean updating our README and adding something to the Release
Notes.
In addition to the "we don't recommend it" text, a warning that we plan to
remove it in the next version would also be good.
-Sean
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everyone else correct me if I'm mistaken, but I assume "deprecate Hadoop 1
> for 1.6.0" would primarily be an advertising/documentation change. Let
> people know that it works, but it's not recommended that you use it".
>
>
> On 4/4/14, 8:23 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what it means to "deprecate" support in 1.6.0. Changing a
>> minimum dependency isn't something you can really "deprecate" in the
>> traditional sense of code deprecation. Perhaps this would mean just
>> annotating in the 1.6.x release notes that this will be the last
>> version supporting Hadoop 1, and that we encourage users to consider
>> upgrading?
>>
>> However, I am in favor of dropping hadoop1 support (making hadoop
>> 2.0.0, even 2.2.0 the minimum supported dependency) in the next
>> version after the 1.6.x series (presently named 1.7.0), so long as we
>> continue to support Hadoop 1 in 1.6.x releases.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Joey Echeverria <jo...@clouderagovt.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to deprecating hadoop1 support in 1.6.0
>>> +1 to dropping hadoop1 support in 1.7.0 (or similar release)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joey Echeverria
>>> Chief Architect
>>> Cloudera Government Solutions
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 ditto on what's been said
>>>>
>>>> Not sure on how "aggressive" it would be to call hadoop1 deprecated for
>>>> 1.6.0, but I wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Can certainly poll the
>>>> user
>>>> list for input. We've already "encouraged" hadoop2 by switching the
>>>> build
>>>> profiles for 1.6, perhaps it's not unreasonable to call it deprecated
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/4/14, 2:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
>>>>> deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from
>>>>> user
>>>>> list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both
>>>>>>> 1.5
>>>>>>> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is
>>>>>>>>> solidly
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> community,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> future
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> releases?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
--
Sean
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
Everyone else correct me if I'm mistaken, but I assume "deprecate Hadoop
1 for 1.6.0" would primarily be an advertising/documentation change. Let
people know that it works, but it's not recommended that you use it".
On 4/4/14, 8:23 PM, Christopher wrote:
> I'm not sure what it means to "deprecate" support in 1.6.0. Changing a
> minimum dependency isn't something you can really "deprecate" in the
> traditional sense of code deprecation. Perhaps this would mean just
> annotating in the 1.6.x release notes that this will be the last
> version supporting Hadoop 1, and that we encourage users to consider
> upgrading?
>
> However, I am in favor of dropping hadoop1 support (making hadoop
> 2.0.0, even 2.2.0 the minimum supported dependency) in the next
> version after the 1.6.x series (presently named 1.7.0), so long as we
> continue to support Hadoop 1 in 1.6.x releases.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Joey Echeverria <jo...@clouderagovt.com> wrote:
>> +1 to deprecating hadoop1 support in 1.6.0
>> +1 to dropping hadoop1 support in 1.7.0 (or similar release)
>>
>> --
>> Joey Echeverria
>> Chief Architect
>> Cloudera Government Solutions
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1 ditto on what's been said
>>>
>>> Not sure on how "aggressive" it would be to call hadoop1 deprecated for
>>> 1.6.0, but I wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Can certainly poll the user
>>> list for input. We've already "encouraged" hadoop2 by switching the build
>>> profiles for 1.6, perhaps it's not unreasonable to call it deprecated too.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/4/14, 2:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
>>>> deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
>>>> list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>>>>>
>>>>> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
>>>>>
>>>>> drop
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
>>>>>> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> community,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
>>>>>
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> support
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> future
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> releases?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
I'm not sure what it means to "deprecate" support in 1.6.0. Changing a
minimum dependency isn't something you can really "deprecate" in the
traditional sense of code deprecation. Perhaps this would mean just
annotating in the 1.6.x release notes that this will be the last
version supporting Hadoop 1, and that we encourage users to consider
upgrading?
However, I am in favor of dropping hadoop1 support (making hadoop
2.0.0, even 2.2.0 the minimum supported dependency) in the next
version after the 1.6.x series (presently named 1.7.0), so long as we
continue to support Hadoop 1 in 1.6.x releases.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Joey Echeverria <jo...@clouderagovt.com> wrote:
> +1 to deprecating hadoop1 support in 1.6.0
> +1 to dropping hadoop1 support in 1.7.0 (or similar release)
>
> --
> Joey Echeverria
> Chief Architect
> Cloudera Government Solutions
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 ditto on what's been said
>>
>> Not sure on how "aggressive" it would be to call hadoop1 deprecated for
>> 1.6.0, but I wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Can certainly poll the user
>> list for input. We've already "encouraged" hadoop2 by switching the build
>> profiles for 1.6, perhaps it's not unreasonable to call it deprecated too.
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/14, 2:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
>>> deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
>>> list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>>>>
>>>> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
>>>>
>>>> drop
>>>>>
>>>>> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
>>>>> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
>>>>>>
>>>>>> community,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
>>>>
>>>> with
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
>>>>>
>>>>> support
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
>>>>>>
>>>>>> future
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> releases?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sean
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Joey Echeverria <jo...@clouderagovt.com>.
+1 to deprecating hadoop1 support in 1.6.0
+1 to dropping hadoop1 support in 1.7.0 (or similar release)
--
Joey Echeverria
Chief Architect
Cloudera Government Solutions
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 ditto on what's been said
>
> Not sure on how "aggressive" it would be to call hadoop1 deprecated for
> 1.6.0, but I wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Can certainly poll the user
> list for input. We've already "encouraged" hadoop2 by switching the build
> profiles for 1.6, perhaps it's not unreasonable to call it deprecated too.
>
>
> On 4/4/14, 2:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala wrote:
>>
>> +1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
>> deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
>> list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>>>
>>> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
>>>
>>> drop
>>>>
>>>> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
>>>> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>>>>
>>>> -Sean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
>>>>>
>>>>> moving
>>>>>>
>>>>>> forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
>>>>>
>>>>> community,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
>>>
>>> with
>>>>>
>>>>> that
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
>>>>
>>>> support
>>>>>>
>>>>>> both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
>>>>>
>>>>> future
>>>>>>
>>>>>> releases?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sean
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1 ditto on what's been said
Not sure on how "aggressive" it would be to call hadoop1 deprecated for
1.6.0, but I wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Can certainly poll the
user list for input. We've already "encouraged" hadoop2 by switching the
build profiles for 1.6, perhaps it's not unreasonable to call it
deprecated too.
On 4/4/14, 2:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala wrote:
> +1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
> deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
> list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>>
>> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
>> drop
>>> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
>>> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>>>
>>> -Sean
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
>>>> moving
>>>>> forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
>>>> community,
>>>>> hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
>> with
>>>> that
>>>>> I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
>>> support
>>>>> both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
>>>> future
>>>>> releases?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ravi Mutyala <ra...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
> deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
> list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
>
>
Lordy I hope no one is. Really, once the WALs moved into HDFS people
shouldn't have used Accumulo on an HDFS without a good HA story. By and
large, that means Hadoop 2.
--
Sean
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Ravi Mutyala <ra...@hortonworks.com>.
+1 for dropping support for hadoop1 in future versions. +1 to call it
deprecated for Hadoop 1. It might be to good option to get info from user
list if anyone is going to use 1.6 on Hadoop1.
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
>
> Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
> >
> > I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we
> drop
> > it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
> > and 1.6 have been EOLd?
> >
> > -Sean
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
> > > moving
> > > > forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
> > > community,
> > > > hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and
> with
> > > that
> > > > I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
> > support
> > > > both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
> > > >
> > > > What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
> > > future
> > > > releases?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10690
Deprecated in 0.98, dropped in 1.0
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
>
> I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we drop
> it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
> and 1.6 have been EOLd?
>
> -Sean
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
> > moving
> > > forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
> > community,
> > > hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and with
> > that
> > > I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to
> support
> > > both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
> > >
> > > What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
> > future
> > > releases?
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
Mike, as of which version is HBase dropping?
I wouldn't want to do this in 1.6.x. Presumably that would mean if we drop
it in the next version, we'd still be supporting Hadoop 1 until both 1.5
and 1.6 have been EOLd?
-Sean
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly
> moving
> > forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop
> community,
> > hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and with
> that
> > I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to support
> > both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
> >
> > What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for
> future
> > releases?
> >
>
--
Sean
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove hadoop1 support
Posted by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>.
HBase has started to drop hadoop 1 support already.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> This is something that crossed my mind recently. Hadoop 2 is solidly moving
> forward and, as someone who does not actively follow the hadoop community,
> hadoop 1 is slowing down. Adoption for hadoop2 is on the rise and with that
> I'm starting to wonder whether it's worth the code complexity to support
> both versions, particularly attempting to harness new features.
>
> What is the communities thought on this, maybe for 1.7 or maybe for future
> releases?
>