You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@mahout.apache.org by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com> on 2017/04/11 15:55:09 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
[ ] +0, I don't care either way,
[ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
because...
Maven staging repo:
*https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/>*
The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Okay rolling back now.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> u can roll this back, i see the issue.
>
> and shuld have a PR fix.
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If we can get a quorum tomorrow morning Pacific let's get whoever can
> join
> > on a hangout; I'll keep an eye on this thread and set up a hangout when
> we
> > have a good time.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
> > > otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
> > >>
> > >> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
> > >> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile
> `viennacl`
> > >>> and `viennacl-omp`
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
> > >>> `viennacl-omp`
> > >>>
> > >>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
> > >>>
> > >>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt
> writ
> > >>> over anything) both tried to do this with
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> > >>> release:prepare release:perform`
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
> > >>> modules:
> > >>>
> > >>> - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
> > >>>
> > >>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and
> OpenMP,
> > >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that
> > as
> > >>> well.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Andy
> > >>>
> > >>> ________________________________
> > >>> From: Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
> > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
> > >>> To: mahout
> > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > >>>
> > >>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check
> -
> > on
> > >>> flights today - will only be available late night
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
> > >>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will
> > allow
> > >>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will
> > suffice.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
> > >>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should
> > know
> > >>> > better.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same
> > >>> page.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
> > >>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
> > >>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published
> > but
> > >>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging
> > >>> binary/jar
> > >>> > etc.
> > >>> > > and
> > >>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with
> native
> > >>> code
> > >>> > > too
> > >>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
> > >>> > distribution,
> > >>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
> > >>> including
> > >>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Kind regards,
> > >>> > > Stevo Slavic.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> smarthi@apache.org
> > >
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or
> > being
> > >>> > > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who
> understands
> > >>> the
> > >>> > > fine
> > >>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > >>> > > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > >>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> > >>> ap.dev@outlook.com
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> > >>> > > release:prepare
> > >>> > > > > >> release:perform
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> ________________________________
> > >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> > >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression.
> > My
> > >>> > guess
> > >>> > > > is
> > >>> > > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
> > >>> > something
> > >>> > > > to
> > >>> > > > > do
> > >>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> ________________________________
> > >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> > >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> > >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you
> know?
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> > >>> > ap.dev@outlook.com>
> > >>> > > > > >> wrote:
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary
> > >>> distro:
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > bin
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
> > >>> derby.log
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > >>> > > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > >>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> > >>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > >>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
> > >>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > >>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > >>> > > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > >>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release
> Candidate
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with
> passing
> > >>> tests
> > >>> > > for
> > >>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala
> > >>> example in
> > >>> > > the
> > >>> > > > > >> binary
> > >>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
> > >>> exercised
> > >>> > > > when
> > >>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all
> > cores
> > >>> on
> > >>> > the
> > >>> > > > CPU
> > >>> > > > > >> get
> > >>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from
> > source.
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >>> > > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will
> be
> > >>> > closed
> > >>> > > on
> > >>> > > > > >> > Friday,
> > >>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1
> > >>> binding
> > >>> > > votes
> > >>> > > > > >> > (whichever
> > >>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> > Apache
> > >>> > > Mahout
> > >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0
> release
> > of
> > >>> > > Apache
> > >>> > > > > >> Mahout,
> > >>> > > > > >> > > because...
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> > > *
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > >>> > > > > >> > > <
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > >>> > > > > >> > >*
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > >>> > > > > >> > >
> > >>> > > > > >> >
> > >>> > > > > >>
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>.
u can roll this back, i see the issue.
and shuld have a PR fix.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we can get a quorum tomorrow morning Pacific let's get whoever can join
> on a hangout; I'll keep an eye on this thread and set up a hangout when we
> have a good time.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
> > otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
> >>
> >> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
> >> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl`
> >>> and `viennacl-omp`
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
> >>> `viennacl-omp`
> >>>
> >>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
> >>>
> >>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
> >>> over anything) both tried to do this with
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> >>> release:prepare release:perform`
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
> >>> modules:
> >>>
> >>> - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
> >>>
> >>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
> >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that
> as
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Andy
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
> >>> To: mahout
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>>
> >>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check -
> on
> >>> flights today - will only be available late night
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
> >>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will
> allow
> >>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will
> suffice.
> >>> >
> >>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
> >>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should
> know
> >>> > better.
> >>> >
> >>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same
> >>> page.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
> >>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
> >>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published
> but
> >>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging
> >>> binary/jar
> >>> > etc.
> >>> > > and
> >>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
> >>> code
> >>> > > too
> >>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
> >>> > distribution,
> >>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
> >>> including
> >>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Kind regards,
> >>> > > Stevo Slavic.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org
> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or
> being
> >>> > > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands
> >>> the
> >>> > > fine
> >>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> >>> > > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> >>> ap.dev@outlook.com
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> >>> > > release:prepare
> >>> > > > > >> release:perform
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> ________________________________
> >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression.
> My
> >>> > guess
> >>> > > > is
> >>> > > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
> >>> > something
> >>> > > > to
> >>> > > > > do
> >>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> ________________________________
> >>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> >>> > ap.dev@outlook.com>
> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary
> >>> distro:
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > bin
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
> >>> derby.log
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> >>> > > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> >>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> >>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> >>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
> >>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> >>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> >>> > > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> >>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing
> >>> tests
> >>> > > for
> >>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala
> >>> example in
> >>> > > the
> >>> > > > > >> binary
> >>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
> >>> exercised
> >>> > > > when
> >>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all
> cores
> >>> on
> >>> > the
> >>> > > > CPU
> >>> > > > > >> get
> >>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from
> source.
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>> > > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
> >>> > closed
> >>> > > on
> >>> > > > > >> > Friday,
> >>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1
> >>> binding
> >>> > > votes
> >>> > > > > >> > (whichever
> >>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> Apache
> >>> > > Mahout
> >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release
> of
> >>> > > Apache
> >>> > > > > >> Mahout,
> >>> > > > > >> > > because...
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > *
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> >>> > > > > >> > > <
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> >>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> >>> > > > > >> > >*
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >>> > > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
If we can get a quorum tomorrow morning Pacific let's get whoever can join
on a hangout; I'll keep an eye on this thread and set up a hangout when we
have a good time.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
> otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
>>
>> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
>> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl`
>>> and `viennacl-omp`
>>>
>>>
>>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
>>> `viennacl-omp`
>>>
>>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
>>>
>>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
>>> over anything) both tried to do this with
>>>
>>>
>>> `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>>> release:prepare release:perform`
>>>
>>>
>>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
>>> modules:
>>>
>>> - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
>>>
>>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
>>>
>>>
>>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
>>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
>>> well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
>>> To: mahout
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>>
>>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
>>> flights today - will only be available late night
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
>>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
>>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
>>> >
>>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
>>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
>>> > better.
>>> >
>>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same
>>> page.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
>>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
>>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
>>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging
>>> binary/jar
>>> > etc.
>>> > > and
>>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
>>> code
>>> > > too
>>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
>>> > distribution,
>>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
>>> including
>>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
>>> > >
>>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
>>> > >
>>> > > Kind regards,
>>> > > Stevo Slavic.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
>>> > > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands
>>> the
>>> > > fine
>>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
>>> > > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>>> ap.dev@outlook.com
>>> > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>>> > > release:prepare
>>> > > > > >> release:perform
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My
>>> > guess
>>> > > > is
>>> > > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
>>> > something
>>> > > > to
>>> > > > > do
>>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
>>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>>> > ap.dev@outlook.com>
>>> > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary
>>> distro:
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > bin
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
>>> derby.log
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>>> > > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
>>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
>>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
>>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>>> > > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing
>>> tests
>>> > > for
>>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala
>>> example in
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > >> binary
>>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
>>> exercised
>>> > > > when
>>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores
>>> on
>>> > the
>>> > > > CPU
>>> > > > > >> get
>>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>>> > > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
>>> > closed
>>> > > on
>>> > > > > >> > Friday,
>>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1
>>> binding
>>> > > votes
>>> > > > > >> > (whichever
>>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>>> > > Mahout
>>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
>>> > > Apache
>>> > > > > >> Mahout,
>>> > > > > >> > > because...
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > *
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>>> > > > > >> > > <
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>>> > > > > >> > >*
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>>> > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I'll leave the artifacts up there in case that helps troubleshooting,
otherwise let me know and I'll drop them.
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
>
> Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
> artifact block for the viennacl profile?
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl`
>> and `viennacl-omp`
>>
>>
>> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
>> `viennacl-omp`
>>
>> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
>>
>> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
>> over anything) both tried to do this with
>>
>>
>> `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>> release:prepare release:perform`
>>
>>
>> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
>> modules:
>>
>> - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
>>
>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
>>
>>
>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
>>
>>
>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
>> well.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
>> To: mahout
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
>> flights today - will only be available late night
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
>> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
>> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
>> >
>> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
>> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
>> > better.
>> >
>> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page.
>> >
>> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
>> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
>> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
>> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar
>> > etc.
>> > > and
>> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
>> code
>> > > too
>> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
>> > distribution,
>> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
>> including
>> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
>> > >
>> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
>> > >
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > Stevo Slavic.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
>> > > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands
>> the
>> > > fine
>> > > > > points of making things like this works?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
>> > > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>> ap.dev@outlook.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
>> > > release:prepare
>> > > > > >> release:perform
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My
>> > guess
>> > > > is
>> > > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
>> > something
>> > > > to
>> > > > > do
>> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> ________________________________
>> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
>> > ap.dev@outlook.com>
>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > bin
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
>> derby.log
>> > > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
>> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>> > > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
>> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
>> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > ________________________________
>> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>> > > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing
>> tests
>> > > for
>> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example
>> in
>> > > the
>> > > > > >> binary
>> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
>> exercised
>> > > > when
>> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores
>> on
>> > the
>> > > > CPU
>> > > > > >> get
>> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
>> > closed
>> > > on
>> > > > > >> > Friday,
>> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1
>> binding
>> > > votes
>> > > > > >> > (whichever
>> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>> > > Mahout
>> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
>> > > Apache
>> > > > > >> Mahout,
>> > > > > >> > > because...
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > *
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > > > >> > > <
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
>> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > > > >> > >*
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>> > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I'll look for you online later today for the hangout.
Is there a reason we have the project.version only in the viennacl-omp
artifact block for the viennacl profile?
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl` and
> `viennacl-omp`
>
>
> - the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and
> `viennacl-omp`
>
> - we are trying to build and release for both modules
>
> - yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ
> over anything) both tried to do this with
>
>
> `mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> release:perform`
>
>
> After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new
> modules:
>
> - mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
>
> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
>
>
> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP, the
> source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
>
>
> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
> well.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Andy
>
> ________________________________
> From: Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
> flights today - will only be available late night
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
> > (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
> > users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
> >
> > There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
> > distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
> > better.
> >
> > We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page.
> >
> > Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If I understood problem and goal well:
> > > - module with native code has to be included in the release
> > > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
> > > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar
> > etc.
> > > and
> > > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native
> code
> > > too
> > > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
> > distribution,
> > > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything
> including
> > > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
> > >
> > > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Stevo Slavic.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
> > > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the
> > > fine
> > > > > points of making things like this works?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> ap.dev@outlook.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> > > release:prepare
> > > > > >> release:perform
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My
> > guess
> > > > is
> > > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
> > something
> > > > to
> > > > > do
> > > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> > > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> > ap.dev@outlook.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > bin
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
> derby.log
> > > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> > > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > ________________________________
> > > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing
> tests
> > > for
> > > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example
> in
> > > the
> > > > > >> binary
> > > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get
> exercised
> > > > when
> > > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on
> > the
> > > > CPU
> > > > > >> get
> > > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
> > closed
> > > on
> > > > > >> > Friday,
> > > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding
> > > votes
> > > > > >> > (whichever
> > > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> > > Mahout
> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> > > Apache
> > > > > >> Mahout,
> > > > > >> > > because...
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > *
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > > > >> > > <
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > > > >> > >*
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Yes, We have 2 new modules each which builds with a profile `viennacl` and `viennacl-omp`
- the `viennacl` profile builds for both modules `viennacl` and `viennacl-omp`
- we are trying to build and release for both modules
- yesterday Andrew and I (without my keys in .m2 to ensure I didnt writ over anything) both tried to do this with
`mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare release:perform`
After doing that, the release came up with out the jars for both new modules:
- mahout-native-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
- mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP, the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as well.
Thanks,
Andy
________________________________
From: Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
flights today - will only be available late night
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
> (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
> users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
>
> There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
> distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
> better.
>
> We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page.
>
> Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If I understood problem and goal well:
> > - module with native code has to be included in the release
> > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
> > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar
> etc.
> > and
> > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native code
> > too
> > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
> distribution,
> > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything including
> > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
> >
> > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Stevo Slavic.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
> > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the
> > fine
> > > > points of making things like this works?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> > release:prepare
> > > > >> release:perform
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My
> guess
> > > is
> > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
> something
> > > to
> > > > do
> > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> ap.dev@outlook.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > bin
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > ________________________________
> > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests
> > for
> > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in
> > the
> > > > >> binary
> > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised
> > > when
> > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on
> the
> > > CPU
> > > > >> get
> > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
> closed
> > on
> > > > >> > Friday,
> > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding
> > votes
> > > > >> > (whichever
> > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> > Mahout
> > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> > Apache
> > > > >> Mahout,
> > > > >> > > because...
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > *
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > > >> > > <
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > > >> > >*
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>.
I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
flights today - will only be available late night
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
> (non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
> users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
>
> There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
> distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
> better.
>
> We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page.
>
> Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If I understood problem and goal well:
> > - module with native code has to be included in the release
> > -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
> > -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar
> etc.
> > and
> > -- distribution module should include sources of module with native code
> > too
> > - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources
> distribution,
> > for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything including
> > their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
> >
> > This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Stevo Slavic.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
> > > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the
> > fine
> > > > points of making things like this works?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap.dev@outlook.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> > release:prepare
> > > > >> release:perform
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My
> guess
> > > is
> > > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have
> something
> > > to
> > > > do
> > > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> > > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <
> ap.dev@outlook.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > bin
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> > > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> > > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > ________________________________
> > > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests
> > for
> > > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in
> > the
> > > > >> binary
> > > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised
> > > when
> > > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on
> the
> > > CPU
> > > > >> get
> > > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be
> closed
> > on
> > > > >> > Friday,
> > > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding
> > votes
> > > > >> > (whichever
> > > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> > Mahout
> > > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> > Apache
> > > > >> Mahout,
> > > > >> > > because...
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > *
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > > >> > > <
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > > >> > >*
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I don't understand it fully, but I believe having a binary vanilla
(non-viennacl, non-viennacl-omp) build and source build that will allow
users to build for the viennacl or viennacl-omp profiles will suffice.
There is an extra vienna-omp block in the vienna profile in
distribution/pom.xml that I doubt should be there, but Andy should know
better.
We can set up a hangout if that will be quicker to get on the same page.
Thanks Suneel and Stevo.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I understood problem and goal well:
> - module with native code has to be included in the release
> -- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
> -- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar etc.
> and
> -- distribution module should include sources of module with native code
> too
> - it should be possible from sources (git and release sources distribution,
> for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything including
> their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
>
> This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
> > shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the
> fine
> > > points of making things like this works?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> release:prepare
> > > >> release:perform
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > > >>
> > > >> ________________________________
> > > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess
> > is
> > > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something
> > to
> > > do
> > > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> > > >>
> > > >> ________________________________
> > > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > >>
> > > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > bin
> > > >> >
> > > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> > > >> >
> > > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> > > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> > > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ________________________________
> > > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests
> for
> > > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in
> the
> > > >> binary
> > > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised
> > when
> > > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the
> > CPU
> > > >> get
> > > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed
> on
> > > >> > Friday,
> > > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding
> votes
> > > >> > (whichever
> > > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> Mahout
> > > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of
> Apache
> > > >> Mahout,
> > > >> > > because...
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *
> > > >> >
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > >> > > <
> > > >> >
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> > distribution/0.13.0/
> > > >> > >*
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
If I understood problem and goal well:
- module with native code has to be included in the release
-- module version change only and I guess documentation published but
-- excluding every other plugin like compilation, packaging binary/jar etc.
and
-- distribution module should include sources of module with native code too
- it should be possible from sources (git and release sources distribution,
for maintainers and lib users respectively) to build everything including
their own jar of native module for given target architecture.
This is not easy to achieve with Maven.
Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
> shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the fine
> > points of making things like this works?
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> > >> release:perform
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess
> is
> > >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something
> to
> > do
> > >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > >>
> > >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > bin
> > >> >
> > >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> > >> >
> > >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> > >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> > mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> > >> >
> > >> > ________________________________
> > >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> > >> >
> > >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> > >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> > >> >
> > >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
> > >> binary
> > >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised
> when
> > >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the
> CPU
> > >> get
> > >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> > >> >
> > >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> > >> > Friday,
> > >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> > >> > (whichever
> > >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> > >> Mahout,
> > >> > > because...
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > *
> > >> >
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> distribution/0.13.0/
> > >> > > <
> > >> >
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-
> distribution/0.13.0/
> > >> > >*
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Suneel Marthi <sm...@apache.org>.
Specifically what's the issue, some profile not kicking in or being
shadowed ? i can take a look later tonight.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the fine
> points of making things like this works?
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> >>
> >>
> >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> >> release:perform
> >>
> >>
> >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>
> >>
> >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
> >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to
> do
> >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>
> >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > bin
> >> >
> >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> >> >
> >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >> >
> >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> >> >
> >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
> >> binary
> >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
> >> get
> >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> >> >
> >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> >> > Friday,
> >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> >> > (whichever
> >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >> > >
> >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> >> Mahout,
> >> > > because...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven staging repo:
> >> > >
> >> > > *
> >> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >> > > <
> >> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >> > >*
> >> > >
> >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
Is it you want the profiles activated during the release:perform fork?
If that is the case you need to modify the "arguments" parameter of the
release goal. Depending on how your pom is set up this could be as simple
as "-Darguments=-P+viennacl -P+..." or you may have to modify the pom
(though if you always need those
Profiles active for a release modifying the Pom to include them as release
profiles may be the way to go)
On Thu 13 Apr 2017 at 04:30, Andrew Musselman <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Maven team, we are having trouble getting a couple new modules included
> in our release build and our former "Maven person" can't contribute any
> more at their new job.
>
> Anyone up for some troubleshooting? We release from master, our source repo
> is at https://github.com/apache/mahout, and our latest artifacts are at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> .
>
> Thanks for any help you can offer.
>
> Best
> Andrew
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> To: <de...@mahout.apache.org>
>
>
> Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the fine
> points of making things like this works?
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Okay consider this vote cancelled.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> >>
> >>
> >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> >> release:perform
> >>
> >>
> >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>
> >>
> >> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
> >> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to
> do
> >> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >>
> >> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > bin
> >> >
> >> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> >> >
> >> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> >> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> >> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> >> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> >> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> >> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md
> mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> >> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> >> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >> >
> >> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> >> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> >> >
> >> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
> >> binary
> >> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> >> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
> >> get
> >> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> >> >
> >> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> >> > Friday,
> >> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> >> > (whichever
> >> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >> > >
> >> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> >> Mahout,
> >> > > because...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Maven staging repo:
> >> > >
> >> > > *
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >> > > <
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >> > >*
> >> > >
> >> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
--
Sent from my phone
Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Andrew Musselman <ak...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
To: dev@maven.apache.org <de...@maven.apache.org>
Hi Maven team, we are having trouble getting a couple new modules included
in our release build and our former "Maven person" can't contribute any
more at their new job.
Anyone up for some troubleshooting? We release from master, our source repo
is at https://github.com/apache/mahout, and our latest artifacts are at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
.
Thanks for any help you can offer.
Best
Andrew
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
To: <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the fine
points of making things like this works?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> The line that I suggested the other day:
>>
>>
>> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
>> release:perform
>>
>>
>> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>>
>> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
>> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do
>> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>> >
>> >
>> > bin
>> >
>> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>> >
>> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
>> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
>> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
>> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
>> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> >
>> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
>> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>> >
>> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
>> binary
>> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
>> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
>> get
>> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>> >
>> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
>> > Friday,
>> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
>> > (whichever
>> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
>> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>> Mahout,
>> > > because...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Maven staging repo:
>> > >
>> > > *
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > <
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>> > >*
>> > >
>> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <ak...@apache.org>.
Hi Maven team, we are having trouble getting a couple new modules included
in our release build and our former "Maven person" can't contribute any
more at their new job.
Anyone up for some troubleshooting? We release from master, our source repo
is at https://github.com/apache/mahout, and our latest artifacts are at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
.
Thanks for any help you can offer.
Best
Andrew
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
To: <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the fine
points of making things like this works?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> The line that I suggested the other day:
>>
>>
>> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
>> release:perform
>>
>>
>> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>>
>> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
>> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do
>> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>> >
>> >
>> > bin
>> >
>> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>> >
>> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
>> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
>> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
>> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
>> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> >
>> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
>> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>> >
>> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
>> binary
>> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
>> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
>> get
>> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>> >
>> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
>> > Friday,
>> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
>> > (whichever
>> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
>> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>> Mahout,
>> > > because...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Maven staging repo:
>> > >
>> > > *
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > <
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>> > >*
>> > >
>> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Does anyone know anyone on the Maven project or who understands the fine
points of making things like this works?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:06 PM Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Okay consider this vote cancelled.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> The line that I suggested the other day:
>>
>>
>> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
>> release:perform
>>
>>
>> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>>
>> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
>> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do
>> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>> >
>> >
>> > bin
>> >
>> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>> >
>> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
>> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
>> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
>> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
>> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
>> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
>> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
>> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
>> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
>> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>> >
>> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
>> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>> >
>> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
>> binary
>> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
>> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
>> get
>> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>> >
>> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
>> > Friday,
>> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
>> > (whichever
>> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
>> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>> Mahout,
>> > > because...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Maven staging repo:
>> > >
>> > > *
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>> > > <
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>> > >*
>> > >
>> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
+1
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 11:06:29 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Okay consider this vote cancelled.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> The line that I suggested the other day:
>
>
> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> release:perform
>
>
> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
>
> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do
> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> >
> >
> > bin
> >
> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> >
> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >
> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> >
> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
> binary
> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
> get
> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> >
> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > >
> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> > Friday,
> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> > (whichever
> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> Mahout,
> > > because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >
> > > *
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > >*
> > >
> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Okay consider this vote cancelled.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> The line that I suggested the other day:
>
>
> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> release:perform
>
>
> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
>
> off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is
> that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do
> with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> >
> >
> > bin
> >
> > mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
> >
> > conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> > mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> > mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> > mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> > mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> > metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> > mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> > viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> > To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
> >
> > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
> >
> > The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the
> binary
> > build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> > running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU
> get
> > exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
> >
> > So far I'm +1 (binding).
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> > >
> > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> > Friday,
> > > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> > (whichever
> > > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
> Mahout,
> > > because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >
> > > *
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > >*
> > >
> > > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
The line that I suggested the other day:
mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare release:perform
doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>
>
> bin
>
> mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>
> conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>
> The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
> build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
> exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>
> So far I'm +1 (binding).
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >
> > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> Friday,
> > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> (whichever
> > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> > because...
> >
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> > *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >*
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do with activating the profile -Pviennacl at release time.
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org; user@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>
>
> bin
>
> mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>
> conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>
> The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
> build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
> exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>
> So far I'm +1 (binding).
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >
> > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> Friday,
> > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> (whichever
> > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> > because...
> >
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> > *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >*
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>
>
> bin
>
> mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>
> conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>
> The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
> build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
> exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>
> So far I'm +1 (binding).
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >
> > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> Friday,
> > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> (whichever
> > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> > because...
> >
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> > *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >*
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
oops- sent last email accidentally without finishing..
It looks like we are missing some jars from the binary distro:
andy@micheal:~/sandbox/apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0$ ls *.jar
mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar
mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar
mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar
mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar
mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar
mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar
we are missing mahout-native-viennacl_2.10.jar and mahout-native-viennacl-omp.jar
I think that we need to try a different build command.
Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:42:30 PM
To: user@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
bin
mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
So far I'm +1 (binding).
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
> occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>
> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> because...
>
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/>*
>
> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
oops- sent last email accidentally without finishing..
It looks like we are missing some jars from the binary distro:
andy@micheal:~/sandbox/apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0$ ls *.jar
mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
mahout-math-0.13.0.jar
mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar
mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar
mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar
mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar
mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar
mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar
we are missing mahout-native-viennacl_2.10.jar and mahout-native-viennacl-omp.jar
I think that we need to try a different build command.
Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:42:30 PM
To: user@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
bin
mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
So far I'm +1 (binding).
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
> occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>
> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> because...
>
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/>*
>
> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
>
>
> bin
>
> mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
>
> conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log
> mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs
> mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples
> mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o
> mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib
> metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt
> mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar
> viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>
> The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
> build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
> running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
> exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
>
> So far I'm +1 (binding).
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >
> > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> Friday,
> > April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
> (whichever
> > occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> > because...
> >
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> >
> > *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> >*
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
bin
mahout-integration-0.13.0.jar
conf mahout-math-0.13.0.jar derby.log mahout-math-scala_2.10-0.13.0.jar docs mahout-mr-0.13.0.jar examples mahout-mr-0.13.0-job.jar flink mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0-dependency-reduced.jar h2o mahout-spark_2.10-0.13.0.jar lib metastore_db LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt mahout-examples-0.13.0.jar README.md mahout-examples-0.13.0-job.jar viennacl mahout-hdfs-0.13.0.jar viennacl-omp
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
To: user@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
So far I'm +1 (binding).
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
> occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>
> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> because...
>
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/>*
>
> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
So far I'm +1 (binding).
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
> occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>
> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> because...
>
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/>*
>
> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
running the viennacl profile from source, and saw all cores on the CPU get
exercised when running the viennacl-omp profile from source.
So far I'm +1 (binding).
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.musselman@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
> occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
>
> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> because...
>
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1042/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/>*
>
> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>