Re: EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6

[Andrus Adamchik <aa...@apache.org>]

Hi Dain,

Interesting... IMO that's a good decision. So is this also awaiting a  
submission from Sun? I'll definitely prefer to be involved with this  
specific JSR, rather than the whole JEE6.

Andrus


On May 29, 2007, at 8:59 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> From what I understand JPA will be split out into a separate JSR  
> this time (Thank you Geir and others).
>
> -dain
>
> On May 29, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> I would also like to participate. My interest is mostly in the  
>> area of persistence API's and I've never been involved with the  
>> JCP before. Still I hope I'll be able to make meaningful  
>> contributions.
>>
>> BTW, the only related JSR that I found (#313) is marked as  
>> "withdrawn". So what's the status of it anyways?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On May 28, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> note that Jeff Genender also wishes to participate, at least on  
>>> JavaEE6 IIRC.  You two should sync up on this (here)
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>> On May 25, 2007, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey all.  I'd like to participate in EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6 as an  
>>>> Apache rep on those specs.  Shooting a note out here for  
>>>> discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I was fortunate enough to participate in EJB 3.0 as an  
>>>> independent, but no longer have independent status.  My  
>>>> motivation for continued participation in the EJB spec is  
>>>> obvious (OpenEJB) and these days about half of what one things  
>>>> of in EJB is actually defined by the JavaEE6 spec (injection,  
>>>> naming, much of the xml schema, packaging, etc).
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>]

On Jun 3, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Hi Dain,
>
> Interesting... IMO that's a good decision. So is this also awaiting  
> a submission from Sun? I'll definitely prefer to be involved with  
> this specific JSR, rather than the whole JEE6.

Yes, the whole pile is being held up, I think.  We should see it soon  
though.

geir

>
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 29, 2007, at 8:59 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> From what I understand JPA will be split out into a separate JSR  
>> this time (Thank you Geir and others).
>>
>> -dain
>>
>> On May 29, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> I would also like to participate. My interest is mostly in the  
>>> area of persistence API's and I've never been involved with the  
>>> JCP before. Still I hope I'll be able to make meaningful  
>>> contributions.
>>>
>>> BTW, the only related JSR that I found (#313) is marked as  
>>> "withdrawn". So what's the status of it anyways?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 28, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> note that Jeff Genender also wishes to participate, at least on  
>>>> JavaEE6 IIRC.  You two should sync up on this (here)
>>>>
>>>> geir
>>>>
>>>> On May 25, 2007, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey all.  I'd like to participate in EJB 3.1 and JavaEE6 as an  
>>>>> Apache rep on those specs.  Shooting a note out here for  
>>>>> discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was fortunate enough to participate in EJB 3.0 as an  
>>>>> independent, but no longer have independent status.  My  
>>>>> motivation for continued participation in the EJB spec is  
>>>>> obvious (OpenEJB) and these days about half of what one things  
>>>>> of in EJB is actually defined by the JavaEE6 spec (injection,  
>>>>> naming, much of the xml schema, packaging, etc).
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>