You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by rh...@apache.org on 2015/06/23 11:13:09 UTC

svn commit: r1687000 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Jun 23 09:13:09 2015
New Revision: 1687000

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1687000
Log:
* STATUS: Cast vote. Approve r1686478 group.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1687000&r1=1686999&r2=1687000&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Tue Jun 23 09:13:09 2015
@@ -46,19 +46,6 @@ Other candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: stefan2, brane
 
- * r1686478, r1686888, r1686984
-   Make 'blame -g' work with old clients against new servers.
-   Justification:
-     Without this patch, old clients will "lose track" of what changes
-     happened in -g mode and produce wrong / worse blames than against
-     old servers.
-     The output of 'blame -g' is only an approximation.  However, the
-     new server would cause much worse results in old clients especially
-     in simple cases where lines of development are kept in close sync.
-   Votes:
-     +1: stefan2, rhuijben (without r1686984)
-     +1: brane, philip
-
  * r1682714, r1682854, r1683126, r1683135, r1683290
    Fix segfaults in FSX's directory processing code.
    Justification:
@@ -83,3 +70,16 @@ Approved changes:
      by default.
    Votes:
      +1: stsp, stefan2, brane
+
+ * r1686478, r1686888, r1686984
+   Make 'blame -g' work with old clients against new servers.
+   Justification:
+     Without this patch, old clients will "lose track" of what changes
+     happened in -g mode and produce wrong / worse blames than against
+     old servers.
+     The output of 'blame -g' is only an approximation.  However, the
+     new server would cause much worse results in old clients especially
+     in simple cases where lines of development are kept in close sync.
+   Votes:
+     +1: stefan2 (without r1686984)
+     +1: brane, philip, rhuijben