You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/12/06 15:57:07 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] JarrodJ83 commented on issue #2307: Provide a netcore client

JarrodJ83 commented on issue #2307: Provide a netcore client
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/2307#issuecomment-562629715
 
 
   @sijie I think either of those ideas would be a step in the right direction. Anything that will increase the confidence that, if you are using dotnet and want to use Pulsar, you'll have the ability to leverage the features you need and have good support from the community.
   
   The two projects out there now seem to be going in different directions. One aiming to match the features of the java client and the other not as much. Neither have many contributors (yet). Neither of them have a solid roadmap (yet). Neither of them support all the features of the java client (yet). Specifically I see both are missing Schema which, in my mind, is a key feature. This all makes my confidence level that we will be able to leverage all of Pulsar's features in the near future using dotnet somewhat low.
   
   I am in a similar situation as @rcollina where I think Pulsar is the better option for my company but for better or worse dotnet core is where we are headed with all future development. I worry we will not be able to use Pulsar to its full capability with the state of the two dotnet pulsar clients at present and it is a huge commitment to make without high confidence.
   
   Hopefully this provides some insight that may help you move the dotnet support forward in some way.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services