You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/15 17:45:14 UTC
Re: Several Errors/Problems after Upgrading from 1.1.1 to myfaces 1.1.4/tomahawk 1.1.5
On 9/15/06, martin.kuhn@merkur.at <ma...@merkur.at> wrote:
> I tried to upgrade from myfaces 1.1.1 to myfaces 1.1.4 and tomahawk 1.1.5
> (I use the archives from
> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/core-1.1.x/myfaces-core-1.1.4-r428254-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip)
> and an uptodate tomahawk snapshot)
> What is the recommended version of tomahawk?
This is what I'd recommend, although you can now get MyFaces Core
1.1.4 -- I think it's the same code, though.
> Now I have some new problems in my application (an apllication which is
> already in production usage since several months and works fine).
>
>
> Problem with styling of h:column with rendered attribute usage
> =============================================
> I use a dataTable from Tomahawk and there is a t:column in the table
> rendered only when a special codition is true.
> I style the columns with the columnsClasses attribute of the dataTable.
> This attribute is dynamically provided by a backing bean.
> When the column rendered attribute is true the UI is o.k.
> But when the column isn't rendered the column doesn't get the correct
> css-class. (although the columnsClasses attribute has the correct string
> value of the css classes of the columns)
>
> The desired behavior worked perfectly in Version 1.1.1.
Sounds like a bug. It'd be helpful if you gave a specific example
showing how it's broken, though. It's a little vague.
> 08:36:34,765 ERROR [MyFacesResourceLoader] Unparsable lastModified :
> @lastModified@
You can ignore this one. It's a problem with the way our Maven build
works. The error has been reduced to a warning in the latest code.
> 08:43:56,875 WARN [ReducedHTMLParser] Invalid tag found: unexpected input
> while looking for attr name or '/>' at line 551
This one is serious and you probably better figure out what's
malformed in your page code at line 551.