You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Neal Becker <nd...@gmail.com> on 2005/06/17 04:09:25 UTC

spamc -L ?

There is spamassassin -L, but not spamc -L.  Why not?  I want to use with
kmail, and spamc (with network check) is too slow on my home machine. 
spamassassin -L is OK, but woundn't a spamc -L be faster since it avoids
startup cost?

Re: spamc -L ?

Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.

spamd -L
{^_^}
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neal Becker" <nd...@gmail.com>
To: <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: 2005 June, 16, Thursday 19:09
Subject: spamc -L ?


> There is spamassassin -L, but not spamc -L.  Why not?  I want to use with
> kmail, and spamc (with network check) is too slow on my home machine. 
> spamassassin -L is OK, but woundn't a spamc -L be faster since it avoids
> startup cost?