You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oro-dev@jakarta.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/07/10 14:51:29 UTC

[Bug 2304] - ORO dies on evaluating \001c and takes tomcat with it

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2304

*** shadow/2304	Tue Jun 26 02:58:26 2001
--- shadow/2304.tmp.23849	Tue Jul 10 05:51:29 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | ORO dies on evaluating \001c and takes tomcat with it                      |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2304                        Product: ORO                     |
! |       Status: ASSIGNED                    Version: 2.0.2                   |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Critical                 OS/Version: Linux                   |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Main                    |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | ORO dies on evaluating \001c and takes tomcat with it                      |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2304                        Product: ORO                     |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 2.0.2                   |
! |   Resolution: WORKSFORME                 Platform: PC                      |
  |     Severity: Critical                 OS/Version: Linux                   |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Main                    |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 48,50 ****
--- 48,56 ----
  ------- Additional Comments From wieland@netvertising.ch  2001-06-26 02:58 -------
  Created an attachment (id=254)
  addidional comments and log output (tomcat&console)
+ 
+ 
+ ------- Additional Comments From dfs@apache.org  2001-07-10 05:51 -------
+ Changing status of bug to WORKSFORME because I cannot reproduce it and the
+ bug reporter has not responded to request for sample input and a main()
+ that reproduces problem.