You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/01 12:29:39 UTC
script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Hi All,
I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
simple mojo.
What do you think?
Stefano
--
Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com>.
Hi Siegfried,
here you find what I've done so far. If you think it could make sense,
I can set up a git repository until Tomek gives us directions.
NOTES:
1. I have removed the parent section from the pom, I could not find it
on any repository
2. I did not change the site yet.
Any feedback is welcome.
Ste
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Same here .... :-)
>
> Stefano Fornari wrote:
>> Hi Tomek,
>> I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to
>> proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do
>> you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes).
>>
>> Please let me know.
>> Ste
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
>>> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>>> simple mojo.
>>>>
>>> Yes, go for it.
>>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
>>> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
>>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
>>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Stefano
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ste
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Ste
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com>.
It looks like my prev message got stopped because of the attachment...
Hi Siegfried,
here (http://github.com/stefanofornari/script-maven-plugin) you find
what I've done so far. If you think it could make sense,
I can set up a git repository until Tomek gives us directions.
NOTES:
1. I have removed the parent section from the pom, I could not find it
on any repository
2. I did not change the site yet.
Any feedback is welcome.
Ste
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Same here .... :-)
>
> Stefano Fornari wrote:
>> Hi Tomek,
>> I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to
>> proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do
>> you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes).
>>
>> Please let me know.
>> Ste
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
>>> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>>> simple mojo.
>>>>
>>> Yes, go for it.
>>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
>>> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
>>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
>>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomek
>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Stefano
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ste
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Same here .... :-)
Stefano Fornari wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
> I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to
> proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do
> you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes).
>
> Please let me know.
> Ste
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
>> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>> simple mojo.
>>>
>> Yes, go for it.
>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
>> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tomek
>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ste
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com>.
Hi Tomek,
I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to
proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do
you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes).
Please let me know.
Ste
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>> simple mojo.
>
> Yes, go for it.
> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>
> Regards,
> Tomek
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>> --
>> Ste
>>
>
--
Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
rather than always invoking the scripts in the same jvm as used to run
maven, if you add support for toolchains, you could fork a toolchains
defined jvm so that maven can be run from one jvm and the script from
another
2010/1/2 Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> could you clarify the statement - I think I miss a bit or two .... :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> I'd like to see support for toolchains so that you don't have to run
>> maven with jdk 6 to use scripting
>>
>> Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
>>
>> On 2 Jan 2010, at 16:33, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
>>> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>>> simple mojo.
>>>
>>> Yes, go for it.
>>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
>>> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
>>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
>>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomek
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Stefano
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ste
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Stephen,
could you clarify the statement - I think I miss a bit or two .... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stephen Connolly wrote:
> I'd like to see support for toolchains so that you don't have to run
> maven with jdk 6 to use scripting
>
> Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
>
> On 2 Jan 2010, at 16:33, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
>> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>> simple mojo.
>>
>> Yes, go for it.
>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
>> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tomek
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ste
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stephen Connolly <st...@gmail.com>.
I'd like to see support for toolchains so that you don't have to run
maven with jdk 6 to use scripting
Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
On 2 Jan 2010, at 16:33, Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
> <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it
>> seems
>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>> simple mojo.
>
> Yes, go for it.
> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
> and then whole GMaven thing comes...
> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's
> environments,
> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
>
> Regards,
> Tomek
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>> --
>> Ste
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
> simple mojo.
Yes, go for it.
Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind
and then whole GMaven thing comes...
Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments,
I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF.
Regards,
Tomek
>
> What do you think?
>
> Stefano
>
> --
> Ste
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Stefano Fornari
<st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...] If this is ok for you, do you know which directory
> scanner shall we use?
Got it: org.codehaus.plexus.util.DirectoryScanner
--
Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I know; that would not be a limitation for me, therefore is not
something I would spend time on. But if you feel we should have it,
maybe it is a piece you can take care of. How does it sound to you?
BTW, as you will see the current implementation is straightforward.
On a different topic, wrt implementation, I was thinking of using the
standard maven directory src/main/scripts as root for the directory
scanner, so that we do not really have to specify a base directory and
we can use includes and excludes to evaluate a subset of the files.
What do you think? If this is ok for you, do you know which directory
scanner shall we use?
Ste
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> in that case you would tie the latest incarnation of the
> script-maven-plugin to the JDK 1.6 ... :-)
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS : I have a look at the plugin tonight
>
> Stefano Fornari wrote:
>> Siegfried,
>> that would be great. I guess the first question I would answer is if
>> we need tu update BSF support. My vote is to use the previous version
>> of the script plugin when JSR223 is not available.
>>
>> The changes I would like to do for now is to being able to specify
>> more files to be evaluated.
>>
>> Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Stefano,
in that case you would tie the latest incarnation of the
script-maven-plugin to the JDK 1.6 ... :-)
Siegfried Goeschl
PS : I have a look at the plugin tonight
Stefano Fornari wrote:
> Siegfried,
> that would be great. I guess the first question I would answer is if
> we need tu update BSF support. My vote is to use the previous version
> of the script plugin when JSR223 is not available.
>
> The changes I would like to do for now is to being able to specify
> more files to be evaluated.
>
> Ste
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
> <si...@it20one.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> I think it is a good idea to improve the plugin - as a quick note
>> bsf-3.0-X provides JSR223 for JDK 1.5.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>
>> PS: Stefano & Tomasz - I would like to help as well to improve the
>> plugin ..
>>
>> Stefano Fornari wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>>> simple mojo.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Stefano Fornari <st...@gmail.com>.
Siegfried,
that would be great. I guess the first question I would answer is if
we need tu update BSF support. My vote is to use the previous version
of the script plugin when JSR223 is not available.
The changes I would like to do for now is to being able to specify
more files to be evaluated.
Ste
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<si...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> I think it is a good idea to improve the plugin - as a quick note
> bsf-3.0-X provides JSR223 for JDK 1.5.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> PS: Stefano & Tomasz - I would like to help as well to improve the
> plugin ..
>
> Stefano Fornari wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
>> simple mojo.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: script-maven-plugin: suport for JSR223
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Hi Stefano,
I think it is a good idea to improve the plugin - as a quick note
bsf-3.0-X provides JSR223 for JDK 1.5.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
PS: Stefano & Tomasz - I would like to help as well to improve the
plugin ..
Stefano Fornari wrote:
> Hi All,
> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into
> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I
> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than
> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems
> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only.
> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino
> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it
> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports
> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can
> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute
> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to
> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this
> simple mojo.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Stefano
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org