You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by ba...@apache.org on 2016/05/13 17:40:26 UTC
svn commit: r1743707 -
/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Author: bayard
Date: Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
New Revision: 1743707
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1743707&view=rev
Log:
Removing ? mark typo
Modified:
infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext?rev=1743707&r1=1743706&r2=1743707&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext (original)
+++ infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ PMCs should use their judgement, err on
### Does the policy apply to binary/object files, such as executables or JAR files? ### {#faq-binaries}
Yes. Even if there are no source files within the release, the LICENSE file and NOTICE file are still both required within
-every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.?gz, .zip, .exe installer, or any
+every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.gz, .zip, .exe installer, or any
other file format used for distributions. For example, Windows .exe files must not be used as a unit of distribution
unless they are installers and include the LICENSE and NOTICE files in their installation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1743707 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
+1
Just .tar.gz is good, well recognised extension. .tgz not used as much now.
Also .tar (and .tar.xz, .tar.bz2 etc) are covered by "other" later in the
sentence.
On 15 May 2016 3:21 a.m., "Henri Yandell" <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 13 May 2016 at 18:40, <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Author: bayard
>> > Date: Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
>> > New Revision: 1743707
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1743707&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Removing ? mark typo
>>
>> AFAIK it was not a typo.
>>
>> I think it is supposed to represent .tgz and .tar.gz etc.
>>
>
> I pondered that, but if it was it was a very unclear way to represent it.
>
> Though .tar/.gz is not fully clear either. I'll also remove the / and just
> say tar.gz.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r1743707 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:28 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 May 2016 at 18:40, <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: bayard
> > Date: Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
> > New Revision: 1743707
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1743707&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Removing ? mark typo
>
> AFAIK it was not a typo.
>
> I think it is supposed to represent .tgz and .tar.gz etc.
>
I pondered that, but if it was it was a very unclear way to represent it.
Though .tar/.gz is not fully clear either. I'll also remove the / and just
say tar.gz.
Hen
Re: svn commit: r1743707 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 13 May 2016 at 18:40, <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
> New Revision: 1743707
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1743707&view=rev
> Log:
> Removing ? mark typo
AFAIK it was not a typo.
I think it is supposed to represent .tgz and .tar.gz etc.
> Modified:
> infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
>
> Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext?rev=1743707&r1=1743706&r2=1743707&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext (original)
> +++ infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ PMCs should use their judgement, err on
>
> ### Does the policy apply to binary/object files, such as executables or JAR files? ### {#faq-binaries}
> Yes. Even if there are no source files within the release, the LICENSE file and NOTICE file are still both required within
> -every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.?gz, .zip, .exe installer, or any
> +every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.gz, .zip, .exe installer, or any
> other file format used for distributions. For example, Windows .exe files must not be used as a unit of distribution
> unless they are installers and include the LICENSE and NOTICE files in their installation.
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org