You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Yin Huai (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/21 20:01:05 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10731) The head() implementation of
dataframe is very slow
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14901092#comment-14901092 ]
Yin Huai commented on SPARK-10731:
----------------------------------
Looks like the problem is df.collect does not work well with limit. In Scala, {{df.limit(1).rdd.count()}} will also trigger the problem.
> The head() implementation of dataframe is very slow
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-10731
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10731
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: PySpark
> Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Jerry Lam
> Labels: pyspark
>
> df=sqlContext.read.parquet("someparquetfiles")
> df.head()
> The above lines take over 15 minutes. It seems the dataframe requires 3 stages to return the first row. It reads all data (which is about 1 billion rows) and run Limit twice. The take(1) implementation in the RDD performs much better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org