You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> on 2011/04/19 23:37:41 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1095214 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: upgrade.c wc-metadata.sql wc.h wc_db_pristine.c

Bert:

I think you should check with the community before doing a format
bump. You're cutting us out of the conversation.

-g

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:05,  <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Apr 19 21:05:28 2011
> New Revision: 1095214
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1095214&view=rev
> Log:
> Bump our working copy format version to 28 and fixup the remaining MD5
> references in the NODES table to SHA1. (This also fixes the reference counts)
>
> On any working copy checked out in +- the last half year (and probably longer)
> this only bumps the working copy format number.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c
>  (bump_to_28): New function.
>  (svn_wc__upgrade_sdb): Add bump to 28.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
>  (STMT_UPGRADE_TO_28): Add the bump to format 28 query.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
>  (SVN_WC__VERSION): Document format 28 and switch to 28.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c
>  (svn_wc__db_pristine_read): Revert r1095194, which reverted some parts of
>    r1091381.
>
> Modified:
>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c
>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c
>...

Re: svn commit: r1095214 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: upgrade.c wc-metadata.sql wc.h wc_db_pristine.c

Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Sorry, folks.   I'm a guilty party here, too.  I got cranky about a prior
commit that made bogus assumptions about the state of the database,
ultimately annoyin^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hencouraging Bert to make this format bump.

On 04/19/2011 05:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Bert:
> 
> I think you should check with the community before doing a format
> bump. You're cutting us out of the conversation.
> 
> -g
> 
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 17:05,  <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: rhuijben
>> Date: Tue Apr 19 21:05:28 2011
>> New Revision: 1095214
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1095214&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Bump our working copy format version to 28 and fixup the remaining MD5
>> references in the NODES table to SHA1. (This also fixes the reference counts)
>>
>> On any working copy checked out in +- the last half year (and probably longer)
>> this only bumps the working copy format number.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c
>>  (bump_to_28): New function.
>>  (svn_wc__upgrade_sdb): Add bump to 28.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
>>  (STMT_UPGRADE_TO_28): Add the bump to format 28 query.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
>>  (SVN_WC__VERSION): Document format 28 and switch to 28.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c
>>  (svn_wc__db_pristine_read): Revert r1095194, which reverted some parts of
>>    r1091381.
>>
>> Modified:
>>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/upgrade.c
>>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
>>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
>>    subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pristine.c
>> ...


-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand