You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by killbulle <ma...@zenika.com> on 2013/05/16 12:40:39 UTC
Strange keep alive effect KeepAlive
Hi the list,
i recently encounter a problem where in some very rare case some request
response time appear to include the keepAliveTimeout! ?!!!???
For example with an average 250ms per requests, i found some around 17250 ms
or 27250 ms if my keepAliveTimout is 17000 or 27000.
Or as I understand the keepAliveTimeout and test it ....it a bloking read
timeout ..
To reproduce this add some latency helps but it still uncommon
I can't explain the phenomen...
Any ideas I'am missing sommething...
Regards marc
--
View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/Strange-keep-alive-effect-KeepAlive-tp4999096.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Strange keep alive effect KeepAlive
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Marc,
On 5/16/13 6:40 AM, killbulle wrote:
> Hi the list, i recently encounter a problem where in some very rare
> case some request response time appear to include the
> keepAliveTimeout! ?!!!???
Response time as measured... where? By the client? In AccessLogValve?
Somewhere else?
> For example with an average 250ms per requests, i found some around
> 17250 ms or 27250 ms if my keepAliveTimout is 17000 or 27000. Or as
> I understand the keepAliveTimeout and test it ....it a bloking
> read timeout .. To reproduce this add some latency helps but it
> still uncommon I can't explain the phenomen...
Can you reproduce it reliably? If so, post some code and configuration.
> Any ideas I'am missing sommething...
Is the client sending a "connection" header along with the request?
What happens if you set that to "connection: close"? Do the stalls go
away?
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=Mvdr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org