Re: Suggestion: separate cactus-j2ee-12

[Felipe Leme <ma...@felipeal.net>]

Zhong ZHENG wrote:

> So, i am thinking, why not separate the j2ee-12 implementation from cactus?

+1

> I do not mean to abandon servlet 2.2. Support of 2.2 may still be maintained
> but you may choose not to base your future development on it.

It could leave on the famous CACTUS_17_BRANCH :-)

-- Felipe


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Suggestion: separate cactus-j2ee-12

[Felipe Leme <ma...@felipeal.net>]

Zhong ZHENG wrote:

>  - adding portlet unit support.


BTW, we have already a Jira issue for that:

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-230

Let's keep the portlet unit related thread over there, so we have a 
better history...

-- Felipe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Suggestion: separate cactus-j2ee-12

[Felipe Leme <ma...@felipeal.net>]

Zhong ZHENG wrote:

> I would like to know, if i want to contribute sth for cactus, is the trunk
> up-to-date? 

The trunk should be ok - there might be some work added only to
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/cactus/branches/CACTUS_17_CARGO_BRANCH/, 
but it will be merged to the trunk soon (if so)...


> Or which branch should i use?

I would prefer that you use the Maven 2 branch 
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/cactus/branches/CACTUS_TRUNK_MAVEN2_BRANCH/), 
so we would have only one branch to merge later. But if it turns out to 
be harder this way, just do it on the trunk anyways (and we adjust the 
M2 branch afterwards...)
[]s,

-- Felipe



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Suggestion: separate cactus-j2ee-12

[Zhong ZHENG <he...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I am currently checking the source of cactus 1.7.1, and am trying to do the
following:
 - preparing the project layout for maven 2 migration
 - replacing the j2ee-12 impl by HttpServletRequestWrapper provided in j2ee
1.3
 - adding portlet unit support.

I would like to know, if i want to contribute sth for cactus, is the trunk
up-to-date? Or which branch should i use?

Regards.

On 1/4/06, Felipe Leme <ma...@felipeal.net> wrote:
>
> Zhong ZHENG wrote:
>
> > So, i am thinking, why not separate the j2ee-12 implementation from
> cactus?
>
> +1
>
> > I do not mean to abandon servlet 2.2. Support of 2.2 may still be
> maintained
> > but you may choose not to base your future development on it.
>
> It could leave on the famous CACTUS_17_BRANCH :-)
>
> -- Felipe
>
>

--
ZHENG Zhong
- http://heavyz.blogspot.com/
- http://people.apache.org/~zheng/