You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/08/06 04:48:26 UTC
State of branches 2.0.0
I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
version number.
Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
appropriate released version numbers.
We should be about ready to build and start TCK.
Re: State of branches 2.0.0
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Aighty... still seems weird, but okay :-)
--jason
On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> 2.0 release will be based on branches/2.0.0 (and I guess, will be
> tagged tags\2.0 later on). branches\2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> --vamsi
>
> On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
> difference between these 2 branches:
>
> server/branches/2.0
> server/branches/2.0.0
>
> ?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
> > artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
> > version number.
> >
> > Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
> > appropriate released version numbers.
> >
> > We should be about ready to build and start TCK.
>
>
Re: State of branches 2.0.0
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
2.0 release will be based on branches/2.0.0 (and I guess, will be tagged
tags\2.0 later on). branches\2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>
> I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
> difference between these 2 branches:
>
> server/branches/2.0
> server/branches/2.0.0
>
> ?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
> > artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
> > version number.
> >
> > Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
> > appropriate released version numbers.
> >
> > We should be about ready to build and start TCK.
>
>
Re: State of branches 2.0.0
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Branches 2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
2.0.0 is the release branch and is considered stable if there is
such a thing. The final bits and moving of stuff to prepare for a
release makes it easier to have it separate.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 4:22 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
> difference between these 2 branches:
>
> server/branches/2.0
> server/branches/2.0.0
>
> ?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
>> artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
>> version number.
>>
>> Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
>> appropriate released version numbers.
>>
>> We should be about ready to build and start TCK.
>
>
Re: State of branches 2.0.0
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
difference between these 2 branches:
server/branches/2.0
server/branches/2.0.0
?
--jason
On Aug 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I updated the version number to 2.0 from 2.0-SNAPSHOT. These
> artifacts should not be deployed as they have the official 2.0
> version number.
>
> Also, updated the versions of many released artifacts to they're
> appropriate released version numbers.
>
> We should be about ready to build and start TCK.