[math] location for 1.0, 1.1 javadocs

[Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>]

I am in process of rolling what I hope will be the final 1.1 RC. We need to 
settle the issue of where to locate the 1.0 and 1.1 javadocs. If there are 
no objections, I plan to rename the /api directory that contains the
1.0javadoc to api-1-0 and create a api-1-1 for the
1.1 javadoc, keeping /apidocs for current development. Any problems with 
this?

Phil

Re: [math] location for 1.0, 1.1 javadocs

[Al Chou <ho...@yahoo.com>]

--- Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > I am in process of rolling what I hope will be the final 1.1 RC. We need to
> 
> > settle the issue of where to locate the 1.0 and 1.1 javadocs. If there are 
> > no objections, I plan to rename the /api directory that contains the
> > 1.0javadoc to api-1-0 and create a api-1-1 for the
> > 1.1 javadoc, keeping /apidocs for current development. Any problems with 
> > this?
> 
> I believe this is a good pattern, although using a - instead of a . is a 
> little unusual. This is the JodaTime route, [collections] is slightly 
> different:
> 
> apidocs - cvs latest
> api-1.0 - version 1.0
> api-1.1 - version 1.1
> api-release - symbolic link to latest version (used on website)
> 
> Stephen

I prefer this latter naming convention using the .'s in the version numbers.


Al


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [math] location for 1.0, 1.1 javadocs

[Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>]

Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am in process of rolling what I hope will be the final 1.1 RC. We need to 
> settle the issue of where to locate the 1.0 and 1.1 javadocs. If there are 
> no objections, I plan to rename the /api directory that contains the
> 1.0javadoc to api-1-0 and create a api-1-1 for the
> 1.1 javadoc, keeping /apidocs for current development. Any problems with 
> this?

I believe this is a good pattern, although using a - instead of a . is a 
little unusual. This is the JodaTime route, [collections] is slightly 
different:

apidocs - cvs latest
api-1.0 - version 1.0
api-1.1 - version 1.1
api-release - symbolic link to latest version (used on website)

Stephen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org