[GitHub] [spark] cloud-fan commented on a diff in pull request #38924: [SPARK-41398][SQL] Relax constraints on Storage-Partitioned Join when partition keys after runtime filtering do not match

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

cloud-fan commented on code in PR #38924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38924#discussion_r1041671515


##########
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/BatchScanExec.scala:
##########
@@ -81,18 +81,21 @@ case class BatchScanExec(
 
           val newRows = new InternalRowSet(p.expressions.map(_.dataType))
           newRows ++= newPartitions.map(_.asInstanceOf[HasPartitionKey].partitionKey())
-          val oldRows = p.partitionValuesOpt.get
 
-          if (oldRows.size != newRows.size) {
-            throw new SparkException("Data source must have preserved the original partitioning " +
-                "during runtime filtering: the number of unique partition values obtained " +
-                s"through HasPartitionKey changed: before ${oldRows.size}, after ${newRows.size}")
+          val oldRows = p.partitionValuesOpt.get.toSet

Review Comment:
   shall we use `InternalRowSet`?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org