You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@opennlp.apache.org by "James Kosin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/26 05:01:15 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (OPENNLP-669) Java 1.8 incompatibility and Build failures

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

James Kosin updated OPENNLP-669:
--------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 1.6.1

> Java 1.8 incompatibility and Build failures
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENNLP-669
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-669
>             Project: OpenNLP
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build, Packaging and Test, Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
>         Environment: Windows 8.1 Java 1.8
>            Reporter: James Kosin
>            Assignee: James Kosin
>              Labels: java1.8, java8
>             Fix For: 1.6.1
>
>   Original Estimate: 504h
>  Remaining Estimate: 504h
>
> I just wanted to let everyone know, the OpenNLP project is not compatible with the new Java 1.8.
> I get two (2) issues:
> 1)    Fails test:
>    Failed tests:
> testPerceptronOnPrepAttachDataWithStepSizeDecrease(opennlp.tools
>    .ml.perceptron.PerceptronPrepAttachTest):
>    expected:<0.7756870512503095> but was:
>    <0.7766773953948998>
> 2)    Java document generation fails miserably.
>    [ERROR] *    <li>.bin --> the file is binary
>    [ERROR] ^
>    [ERROR]
> C:\Users\jkosin\Documents\Projects\OpenNLP\opennlp\opennlp-tools\src\mai
> n\java\opennlp\tools\ml\perceptron\SuffixSensitivePerceptronModelWriter.java:41:
>      error: bad use of '>'
>    [ERROR] *    <li>.bin --> the file is binary
>    [ERROR] ^
>    [ERROR]
> C:\Users\jkosin\Documents\Projects\OpenNLP\opennlp\opennlp-tools\src\mai
>    n\java\opennlp\tools\postag\POSModel.java:64: error: reference not found
> The second for javadoc errors are probably due to more stringent checking in javadoc.
> The first... is a bit disconcerting and troubling.  I'm going to check into this; because this error shouldn't be happening.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)