You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Demian Katz <de...@villanova.edu> on 2011/11/01 21:16:00 UTC

Re: LocalParams, bq, and highlighting

> This is definitely an interesting case that i don't think anyone ever
> really considered before.  It seems like a strong argument in favor of
> adding an "hl.q" param that the HighlightingComponent would use as an
> override for whatever the QueryComponent thinks the highlighting query
> should be, that way people expressing complex queries like you you
> describe could do something like...
>
>        qq=solr
>        q=inStock:true AND+_query_:"{!dismax v=$qq}"
>        hl.q={!v=$qq}
>        hl=true
>        fl=name
>        hl.fl=name
>        bq=server
>
> ...what do you think?
>
> wanna file a Jira requesting this as a feature?  Pretty sure the change
> would only require a few lines of code (but of course we'd also need JUnit
> tests which would probably be several dozen lines of code)

First of all, thanks for answering both of my LocalParams-related queries back in September.  I somehow failed to notice your responses until today - it's alarmingly easy to lose things in the flood of solr-user mail - but I greatly appreciate your input on both issues!

It looks like there's already a JIRA ticket (more than a year old) for the hl.q param:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1926

This definitely sounds like it would solve my problem, so I've put in my vote!

- Demian