You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> on 2015/10/26 22:56:41 UTC
[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc0)
The vote is cancelled in favor of a new release candidate.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> I wasn't able to reproduce the problem of FLINK-2800 either. Still looking
> into it.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for a new RC.
> >
> > I tried to reproduce FLINK-2800 but did not succeed yet. I will spend a
> bit
> > more time on it and if we have a fix within time (before a new RC) we can
> > include it.
> >
> > 2015-10-26 10:36 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Now that the pressing issues of the rc0 have been fixed and pushed to
> the
> > > release-0.10 branch, I would like to go ahead and create a new rc1.
> > >
> > > There are still FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 but no immediate fix seems to
> > be
> > > available.
> > >
> > > Any further issues we would like to fix in the new release candidate?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for bringing up the projects and the record API:
> > > >
> > > > - Concerning the projects: Nice to have, but not critical, unless we
> > > want
> > > > to change the names of the Maven artifacts. I would rather not rush
> > this
> > > >
> > > > - Removal of Record API. Good thing to have, but should not be a
> > release
> > > > blocker. I would be fine with doing this for 1.0
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hmm, it took IntelliJ some time to figure out all the consequences
> of
> > > > > removing the Record API.
> > > > > Seems to be more than I initially expected.
> > > > >
> > > > > @Chesnay, do you want to help? I would push my current version to
> my
> > > > > repository and you could take over some packages and fix the tests.
> > > Just
> > > > > reply to me directly to coordinate. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2015-10-22 16:45 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I just deleted the Record API to check what would break.
> > > > > > Doesn't look too scary, just a few tests that need to be adapted.
> > I'm
> > > > > > right in the middle of that. Hope to open a PR soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2015-10-22 16:42 GMT+02:00 Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org
> >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> @RecordAPI: Yes, i was curious where we are at regarding the
> > removal
> > > > of
> > > > > >> the Record API.
> > > > > >> If there are still tests left to port (or other related things)
> > I'd
> > > be
> > > > > >> more than happy to do it (got a /lot/ of free time on my hands).
> > > > > >> The related JIRA issues weren't particularly helpful though in
> > > > figuring
> > > > > >> out what still needs to be done.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> @Project Restructuring: I prefer doing it now.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 22.10.2015 15:54, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> This reminded me that at some point we wanted to remove the old
> > > > record
> > > > > >>> API (
> > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1681). I think
> that
> > > > > Chesnay
> > > > > >>> checked with Henry on this topic in JIRA.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Hueske <
> > fhueske@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I'd like to bring up Vasia's question on the project structure.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Stephan started the discussion and proposed a new project
> > > structure
> > > > > >>>> about
> > > > > >>>> three weeks ago [1].
> > > > > >>>> The proposal was refined a bit and eventually backed by many
> > +1s.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Do we want to make this happen in 0.10 or do we postpone it
> > after
> > > > the
> > > > > >>>> release?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Cheers,
> > > > > >>>> Fabian
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> [1][
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCANC1h_u6qtEsF1WCcoU1d38JGd%2BXTAQWmvp9Stx4vfe68BOjBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> 2015-10-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org
> >:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> We r actually targeting Flink 0.10, since 0.10 would be out by
> > the
> > > > > time
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>> we
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> have Flink-Mahout integration in place.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Till Rohrmann <
> > > > trohrmann@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Forget my last mail. Just found out that the Mahout guys are
> > > still
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> running
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> on 0.9-SNAPSHOT.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Till Rohrmann <
> > > > > trohrmann@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> I found another issue (FLINK-2894
> > > > > >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>) while
> > > > helping
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently we
> > > don't
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> allow
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it is
> not
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> possible
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> specify a serializer for a base class and all its
> subclasses.
> > In
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> order
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to
> > > include a
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> fix
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> for
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> it in 0.10.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel <
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <
> > mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> streaming
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request to
> > > give
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> more
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are not
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> compatible with the detached execution mode.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision on it
> then.
> > > But
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> something
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> needs to be done about it. :')
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the number of
> old
> > > > jobs
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5).
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows
> the
> > > > last
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 5
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> finished
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for
> > the
> > > > old
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> interface
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> and broken again in the new one?
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Shall I open another issue or is there something I need
> to
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> configure
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> in
> > > > > >>>>>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> new web interface and I haven't?
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -V.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen <
> > sewen@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used
> quite
> > a
> > > > bit
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> by
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> streaming
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which
> are
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> always
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> one-shot
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> currently.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels <
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> mxm@apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea
> to
> > > > start
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> testing the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more issues on the
> > way.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push
> those
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> release-0.10 branch.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Eager execution calls are not supported by the
> detached
> > > YARN
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> detached
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> mode.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> programs
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> that
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> try
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In
> > the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> course
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> of
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> throwing a proper exception, he also added detached
> execution
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> mode
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> support
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> execution
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> doesn't
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> work with detached programs is that the client submits
> the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> first
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Flink
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> job
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster
> and
> > > > then
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> returns an
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> program
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> tries
> > > > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> access the ExecutionResult.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for
> the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release. I
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> would
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> like Flink to support detached execution mode but I
> suggest
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> disable
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> include
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> a
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> proper
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> support for the next release.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel <
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode
> > is
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> faulty
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> for
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> basic
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> starting
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster
> -yd
> > -n
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Sachin Goel
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> m. +91-9871457685
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fhueske@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 to that, Stephan.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (release-0.10.0-rc0)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also
> > > found
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> blocker
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, so this RC will need a few patches.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what
> would
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> be the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> blocker.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> but
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> not
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> block
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release on that. They seem to be very corner
> case.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> fix
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> them,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> right
> > > > > >>>>>>>> now
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> and
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> available
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> in
> > > > > >>>>>>>> a
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> release.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we start testing anyways, because I would
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> us
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>>>> find
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> more
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, and we save time if we do not create a new
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> candidate
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> for
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> each patch.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio
> Pompermaier <
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pompermaier@okkam.it
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also point out that Flink-2763 and
> Flink-2800
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> be
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> worth
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> further investigations before this release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flavio
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <
> > gyfora@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Unfortunately I have to say -1
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my
> point
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> view.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vasiliki Kalavri <va...@gmail.com> ezt
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> írta
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> (időpont:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2015.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> okt.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21., Sze, 20:07):
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! Thanks Max :))
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what about the blocker issue (according to the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki)
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> FLINK-2747?
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - weren't we going to get rid of staging
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -V.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen <
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sewen@apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Super, thanks Max!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also bump the master to the next
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> then,
> > > > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> separate
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into release fixes and what goes into the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> version...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> thread,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels <
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidates have to be tested
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Therefore, I
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody to take a look at the release page in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> wiki:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I've compiled the checks into a document. I
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> like
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> everyone
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the checks in the documents to test the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> candidate:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels <
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> mxm@apache.org>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The past months we have been working very
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> to
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> push
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> towards
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to propose the first release
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> ===================================
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> as
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Apache
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Flink
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-rc0 (see
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> )
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> at:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> fingerprint
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> C2909CBF:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> found
> > > > > >>>>>>>> at:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Flink
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> if
> > > > > >>>>>>>> a
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> majority
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> ===================================
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>