You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@mahout.apache.org by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> on 2017/04/23 17:59:18 UTC
New site and logo
The Mahout site is moving to Jekyll with a bit if a new look and so it might be nice to get an update of the logo.
I think the consensus was to keep the Mahout name but I didn’t get a feel for the logo.
One concern mentioned is that Mahout is no longer attached to Hadoop (the elephant) so the blue mahout might not be the best logo.
I’d be willing to start and chip in for a 99designs contest if everyone can chime in about what they want.
1) should we only update the current logo?
2) should we open designs up to non-blue-man logos?
3) what should the criteria be for a winner?
4) given the new moniker Mahout-Samsara, should the logo be identified with that in some way?
Any thoughts we can give to the contest designers will help.
Re: New site and logo
Posted by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>.
Sorry to you go. Replying "unsubscribe" is not going to have any affect,
as you are by now probably gathering. Please send a message to
*dev-unsubscribe@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>*
https://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html
Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org
*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil*
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:07 AM, LuckyBoy <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> unsubscribe
>
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The Mahout site is moving to Jekyll with a bit if a new look and so it
> > might be nice to get an update of the logo.
> >
> > I think the consensus was to keep the Mahout name but I didn’t get a feel
> > for the logo.
> >
> > One concern mentioned is that Mahout is no longer attached to Hadoop (the
> > elephant) so the blue mahout might not be the best logo.
> >
> > I’d be willing to start and chip in for a 99designs contest if everyone
> > can chime in about what they want.
> >
> > 1) should we only update the current logo?
> > 2) should we open designs up to non-blue-man logos?
> > 3) what should the criteria be for a winner?
> > 4) given the new moniker Mahout-Samsara, should the logo be identified
> > with that in some way?
> >
> > Any thoughts we can give to the contest designers will help.
>
Re: New site and logo
Posted by Sebastian Feher <se...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
unsubscribe
On Monday, April 24, 2017 9:08 AM, LuckyBoy <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
unsubscribe
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> The Mahout site is moving to Jekyll with a bit if a new look and so it
> might be nice to get an update of the logo.
>
> I think the consensus was to keep the Mahout name but I didn’t get a feel
> for the logo.
>
> One concern mentioned is that Mahout is no longer attached to Hadoop (the
> elephant) so the blue mahout might not be the best logo.
>
> I’d be willing to start and chip in for a 99designs contest if everyone
> can chime in about what they want.
>
> 1) should we only update the current logo?
> 2) should we open designs up to non-blue-man logos?
> 3) what should the criteria be for a winner?
> 4) given the new moniker Mahout-Samsara, should the logo be identified
> with that in some way?
>
> Any thoughts we can give to the contest designers will help.
Re: New site and logo
Posted by LuckyBoy <lu...@gmail.com>.
unsubscribe
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> The Mahout site is moving to Jekyll with a bit if a new look and so it
> might be nice to get an update of the logo.
>
> I think the consensus was to keep the Mahout name but I didn’t get a feel
> for the logo.
>
> One concern mentioned is that Mahout is no longer attached to Hadoop (the
> elephant) so the blue mahout might not be the best logo.
>
> I’d be willing to start and chip in for a 99designs contest if everyone
> can chime in about what they want.
>
> 1) should we only update the current logo?
> 2) should we open designs up to non-blue-man logos?
> 3) what should the criteria be for a winner?
> 4) given the new moniker Mahout-Samsara, should the logo be identified
> with that in some way?
>
> Any thoughts we can give to the contest designers will help.
Re: New site and logo
Posted by LuckyBoy <lu...@gmail.com>.
unsubscribe
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> The Mahout site is moving to Jekyll with a bit if a new look and so it
> might be nice to get an update of the logo.
>
> I think the consensus was to keep the Mahout name but I didn’t get a feel
> for the logo.
>
> One concern mentioned is that Mahout is no longer attached to Hadoop (the
> elephant) so the blue mahout might not be the best logo.
>
> I’d be willing to start and chip in for a 99designs contest if everyone
> can chime in about what they want.
>
> 1) should we only update the current logo?
> 2) should we open designs up to non-blue-man logos?
> 3) what should the criteria be for a winner?
> 4) given the new moniker Mahout-Samsara, should the logo be identified
> with that in some way?
>
> Any thoughts we can give to the contest designers will help.