You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/23 16:48:20 UTC

Re: Question on use of remoteReplyQueueScaleout for colocated delegates

It is the same parameter. Since each reply is handled in a separate thread,
the more threads you have the more you can process. Assuming of course,
there is CPU available. Correct, in a colocated case, there is no
serialization.

JC

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:

> Eddie Epstein wrote:
> > ...
>
> > -"remoteReplyQueueScaleout" - reply queue scaleout is also tunable for
> > colocated delegates.
> >
> Does it use this same parameter ?  Is there a reason / need to scaleout
> in the colocated delegate case (I thought the main reason to scale-out
> was to parallelize CAS deserialization time, but for co-located case,
> CASes are passed by reference - so there's no deserialization?)
>
> -Marshall
>
>