You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2008/01/15 11:51:17 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] New: - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
Summary: Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories
for relative resources
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Core tasks
AssignedTo: notifications@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: stevel@apache.org
If we add an interface to those resources that can provide relative resources
(e.g. FileResource), then we can start thinking about how to <import> resources,
where the imported files will also make relative references (i.e. their own
<import> calls)
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com 2008-01-15 07:23 -------
Hey, was this your idea or mine? ;)
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com 2008-01-15 07:33 -------
Anyway, that aside, I still don't see any reason that the existing ResourceFactory interface can't be used
here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
------- Additional Comments From stevel@apache.org 2008-01-15 08:00 -------
...didnt know about the existing one. Yes, you are right.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com 2008-01-15 11:21 -------
Are you sure you've checked in changes? I don't find any. :(
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
------- Additional Comments From stevel@apache.org 2008-01-15 10:25 -------
changes checked in to FileResource.
-it will convert backslashes and stuff during conversion, as with normal
filenames. Is this wise?
-Lots of work needed to do the same for zip/jar files and stuff on the classpath
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44239] - Add ability of Ant resource classes to act as factories for relative resources
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
stevel@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |41701
nThis| |
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.