[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-509) Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.

["Ralph Goers (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13916663#comment-13916663 ] 

Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-509:
------------------------------------

As I recall, the %i value is the increment within the time period.  If you had rolled during the "window" then you would have gotten 
output.20140123-005437-1.log
output.20140123-005437-2.log

What you are describing sounds like correct behavior.

> Substitution for a {%i} index does not work properly when date pattern is contains seconds.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-509
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-509
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Appenders, Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-beta9, 2.0-rc1
>            Reporter: Alexander Khokhlov
>
> {code:xml|title=Configuration fragment}
> <RollingRandomAccessFile name="RollingFile" fileName="target/output.log" filePattern="target//output.$${date:yyyyMMdd-HHmmss}-%i.log" >
>         <Policies>
>                 <OnStartupTriggeringPolicy/>
>                 <SizeBasedTriggeringPolicy size="20 KB"/>
>         </Policies>
>         <DefaultRolloverStrategy max="10"/>
>         <PatternLayout>
>                 <Pattern>%d %p %C{1.} [%t] %m%n</Pattern>
>         </PatternLayout>
> </RollingRandomAccessFile>
> {code}
> With provided configuration, result files will be named as follows:
> output.20140123-005437-1.log
> output.20140123-005440-1.log
> output.20140123-005444-1.log
> output.20140123-005448-1.log
> output.20140123-005451-1.log
> instead of:
> output.20140123-005437-1.log
> output.20140123-005440-2.log
> output.20140123-005444-3.log
> output.20140123-005448-4.log
> output.20140123-005451-5.log
> as I expected
> As a result, DefaultRolloverStrategy also not working.
> If to use SimpleDateFormat instead of DateLookup, then the result is the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org