You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2014/09/15 17:31:52 UTC
The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available,
vote closing 9/16
HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
should be straightforward to assess.
The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
The issues resolved in this release are:
HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
RPC is incorrect
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
(00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Esteban Gutierrez <es...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
valid signatures, compiled, ran basic commands from the shell using a
secure cluster and looks good now.
thanks,
esteban.
--
Cloudera, Inc.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> + Verified md5 and signing of src tgz
> + Undid src (no complaints untar'ing for me on mac osx)
> + Built my own tarball
> + Started it up in standalone, loaded up some data. Verified it there.
> + Logs look good. Build looks good.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> > should be straightforward to assess.
> >
> > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release are:
> >
> > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> >
> > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> > RPC is incorrect
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> >
> > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein (via Tom White)
> >
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
+ Verified md5 and signing of src tgz
+ Undid src (no complaints untar'ing for me on mac osx)
+ Built my own tarball
+ Started it up in standalone, loaded up some data. Verified it there.
+ Logs look good. Build looks good.
St.Ack
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> should be straightforward to assess.
>
> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release are:
>
> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
>
> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> RPC is incorrect
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
>
> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>.
+1
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> should be straightforward to assess.
>
> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release are:
>
> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
>
> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> RPC is incorrect
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
>
> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Including me (I forgot to post a vote last night, but hopefully you
don't mind, it's implicit), we have 6 +1 votes, 5 binding, and no 0 or
-1 votes. The vote passes and I will get 0.98.6.1 out and remove the
0.98.6 binaries as soon as that happens.
Thanks to all who voted on the RC.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> +1.
>
> Verify crcs, sigs.
> Checked doc,
> build src with hadoop 1 and 2
> checked hadoop and hbase jars in bin artifacts
> started local cluster
> run LTT
> Run shell smoke tests
>
> Enis
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That is an annoying Mac-ism. Normally I build on Linux boxen so this
>> shouldn't happen again.
>>
>>
>> > On Sep 15, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Andrew,
>> >
>> > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
>> >
>> > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
>> >
>> > ....
>> >
>> > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
>> >> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
>> >> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
>> >> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
>> >> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
>> >> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
>> >> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
>> >> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
>> >> should be straightforward to assess.
>> >>
>> >> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
>> >> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
>> >> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
>> >>
>> >> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>> >>
>> >> The issues resolved in this release are:
>> >>
>> >> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
>> >>
>> >> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
>> >> RPC is incorrect
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
>> >>
>> >> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
>> >> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> >> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >> - Andy
>> >>
>> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> >> Hein (via Tom White)
>> >>
>>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@apache.org>.
Ok,
+1.
Verify crcs, sigs.
Checked doc,
build src with hadoop 1 and 2
checked hadoop and hbase jars in bin artifacts
started local cluster
run LTT
Run shell smoke tests
Enis
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> That is an annoying Mac-ism. Normally I build on Linux boxen so this
> shouldn't happen again.
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
> >
> > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
> >
> > ....
> >
> > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> >> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> >> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> >> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> >> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> >> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> >> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> >> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> >> should be straightforward to assess.
> >>
> >> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> >> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> >> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> >>
> >> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >>
> >> The issues resolved in this release are:
> >>
> >> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> >>
> >> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> >> RPC is incorrect
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> >>
> >> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> >> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> >> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> >> Hein (via Tom White)
> >>
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
That is an annoying Mac-ism. Normally I build on Linux boxen so this shouldn't happen again.
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
>
> tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
>
> ....
>
> Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
>> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
>> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
>> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
>> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
>> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
>> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
>> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
>> should be straightforward to assess.
>>
>> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
>> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
>> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
>>
>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>
>> The issues resolved in this release are:
>>
>> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
>>
>> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
>> RPC is incorrect
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
>>
>> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
>> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein (via Tom White)
>>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
Yes, it is only in the src tarball.
Apart from this all my checks are fine.
Enis
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Did not get those errors on my side for the binaries:
> jms@t430s:/tmp$ tar -xzf hbase-0.98.6.1-hadoop2-bin.tar.gz
> jms@t430s:/tmp$
>
> But got that on the src too. However, as you said, content seems to be
> fine.
>
> I still think we should fix that.
>
> 2014-09-15 21:35 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I saw that too.
> >
> > Agree it is not a blocker.
> >
> > Unit test suite is running.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
> > >
> > > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
> > >
> > > ....
> > >
> > > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> > > > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> > > > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> > > > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> > > > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> > > > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> > > > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> > > > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> > > > should be straightforward to assess.
> > > >
> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > > > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and
> Maven
> > > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> > > >
> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > >
> > > > The issues resolved in this release are:
> > > >
> > > > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection
> > attempts
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> > > >
> > > > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> > > > RPC is incorrect
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> > > >
> > > > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch
> release,
> > > > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > > Hein (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Unit test suite passed.
+1 from me.
[INFO] HBase - Integration Tests ......................... SUCCESS [0.964s]
[INFO] HBase - Examples .................................. SUCCESS [5.818s]
[INFO] HBase - Assembly .................................. SUCCESS [0.857s]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 1:00:00.281s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Sep 16 01:39:03 UTC 2014
[INFO] Final Memory: 47M/458M
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Did not get those errors on my side for the binaries:
> jms@t430s:/tmp$ tar -xzf hbase-0.98.6.1-hadoop2-bin.tar.gz
> jms@t430s:/tmp$
>
> But got that on the src too. However, as you said, content seems to be
> fine.
>
> I still think we should fix that.
>
> 2014-09-15 21:35 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I saw that too.
> >
> > Agree it is not a blocker.
> >
> > Unit test suite is running.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
> > >
> > > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
> > >
> > > ....
> > >
> > > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> > > > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> > > > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> > > > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> > > > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> > > > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> > > > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> > > > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> > > > should be straightforward to assess.
> > > >
> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > > > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and
> Maven
> > > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> > > >
> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > >
> > > > The issues resolved in this release are:
> > > >
> > > > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection
> > attempts
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> > > >
> > > > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> > > > RPC is incorrect
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> > > >
> > > > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch
> release,
> > > > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > > Hein (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Did not get those errors on my side for the binaries:
jms@t430s:/tmp$ tar -xzf hbase-0.98.6.1-hadoop2-bin.tar.gz
jms@t430s:/tmp$
But got that on the src too. However, as you said, content seems to be fine.
I still think we should fix that.
2014-09-15 21:35 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> I saw that too.
>
> Agree it is not a blocker.
>
> Unit test suite is running.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew,
> >
> > Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
> >
> > tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
> >
> > ....
> >
> > Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> > > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> > > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> > > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> > > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> > > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> > > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> > > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> > > should be straightforward to assess.
> > >
> > > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> > >
> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >
> > > The issues resolved in this release are:
> > >
> > > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection
> attempts
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> > >
> > > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> > > RPC is incorrect
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> > >
> > > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> > > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I saw that too.
Agree it is not a blocker.
Unit test suite is running.
Cheers
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
>
> tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
>
> ....
>
> Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> > committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> > functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> > necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> > HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> > also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> > serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> > Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> > should be straightforward to assess.
> >
> > The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release are:
> >
> > HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
> >
> > HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> > RPC is incorrect
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
> >
> > I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> > therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein (via Tom White)
> >
>
Re: The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is
available, vote closing 9/16
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
Andrew,
Extending the tarballs gives a lot of:
tar: Ignoring unknown extended header keyword 'SCHILY.nlink'
....
Not a blocker, but seems strange. Is it only me?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> HBASE-11972 came in after 0.98.6 was released, involving a fix
> committed to 0.98.6, where the fix is incomplete and table creation
> functionality is affected if security is active. I think it's
> necessary to push out a patch release containing the fix for
> HBASE-11972 as 0.98.6.1 and then remove the 0.98.6 artifacts. I have
> also included on more fix, for HBASE-11963, which is a rare but
> serious thread leak in replication we encountered in production at
> Salesforce last week. Both of these changes are narrowly scoped and
> should be straightforward to assess.
>
> The 1st HBase 0.98.6.1 patch release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download at http://people.apache.org//~apurtell/0.98.6.1RC0/ and Maven
> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1038/
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release are:
>
> HBASE-11963 Synchronize peer cluster replication connection attempts
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11963
>
> HBASE-11972 The "doAs user" used in the update to hbase:acl table
> RPC is incorrect
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11972
>
> I would like to run a short vote for ~24 hours for this patch release,
> therefore requesting three PMC vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on Tuesday September 16.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>