You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Prasad Priyadarshana Fernando <bp...@gmail.com> on 2016/01/16 16:42:52 UTC

JenaJung new version requried

Hi,

Does any one know about a latest version of jena JUNG

Thanks

*Prasad Priyadarshana Fernando <http://www.linkedin.com/in/prasadfernando>*
Mobile: +1 330 283 5827

Re: JenaJung new version requried

Posted by Damian Steer <d....@bris.ac.uk>.

> On 17 Jan 2016, at 12:05, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> On 16/01/16 15:42, Prasad Priyadarshana Fernando wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Does any one know about a latest version of jena JUNG
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> *Prasad Priyadarshana Fernando <http://www.linkedin.com/in/prasadfernando>*
>> Mobile: +1 330 283 5827
>> 
> 
> (This work isn't part of the Apache Jena project)

Yep, little demo I did years ago.

> It shouldn't be too hard to port it to Jena3.  It will be mostly the package imports renaming.

Just updated it. Yes, code changes are simply renaming imports.

Hope it works ok,

Damian

-- 
Damian Steer
Senior Technical Researcher
Research IT
+44 (0) 117 39 41724

Re: JenaJung new version requried

Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.

On 16/01/16 15:42, Prasad Priyadarshana Fernando wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does any one know about a latest version of jena JUNG
>
> Thanks
>
> *Prasad Priyadarshana Fernando <http://www.linkedin.com/in/prasadfernando>*
> Mobile: +1 330 283 5827
>

(This work isn't part of the Apache Jena project)

It shouldn't be too hard to port it to Jena3.  It will be mostly the 
package imports renaming.

If you that, then send a PR to the github and maybe it'll be updated.

	Andy