You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "Alexei Zakharov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/07/11 19:01:30 UTC
[jira] Updated: (HARMONY-840) [classlib][beans] enabling of tests
from StatementTest class (3)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-840?page=all ]
Alexei Zakharov updated HARMONY-840:
------------------------------------
Attachment: StatementTest3.patch
> [classlib][beans] enabling of tests from StatementTest class (3)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HARMONY-840
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-840
> Project: Harmony
> Type: Improvement
> Environment: winXP
> Reporter: Alexei Zakharov
> Attachments: StatementTest3.patch
>
> Attached patch enables two more tests from org.apache.harmony.beans.tests.java.beans.StatementTest:
> testExecute_ArrayGet
> testExecute_ArrayInvalidSet
> What have been done:
> 1. I have reworked the exception throwing model of Statement.findArrayMethod(). Now our implementation throws the same set of exceptions as RI does.
> 2. I have also removed superfluous parameters from "get" and "set" invocations from tests since tests in their old form were invalid. However, old variants of tests pass on RI. IMHO it is RI bug. I have started new mail thread in the list about this topic. Anyway, even if we decide to be 100% compatible with RI here we will probably need do define an extra test. We don't need to test this doubtful logic in these tests IMHO.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira