You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Benoit Tellier <bt...@linagora.com> on 2015/01/29 18:52:21 UTC
Listener registered to a mailboxPath are not notified when this mailbox
is renamed
Hi,
I am writing a distributed event system for the James mailbox ( so that
IDLE imap command will work in a distributed environement ). Doing this,
I am starting to write tests on top of the existing James event system
and I notice this point :
Listener per mailbox registration is not updated upon MailboxRenamed events.
This implies that listeners do not receive any events after a
mailboxRenamed event (not even this event).
To solve this, we must trigger MailboxRenamed events in the event loop,
and :
- explicitly check from field with these kind of events, and notify clients
- I do not know if we should still be connected in IDLE after a mailbox
rename... rfc2177 is not clear about that,so I don't know if it makes
sens to change the path listener are listening on (move listeners
listening to the old path to the new path ).
But I really think they should be notified about the mailboxRenamed event.
What do you think of it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: Listener registered to a mailboxPath are not notified when this
mailbox is renamed
Posted by Benoit Tellier <bt...@linagora.com>.
Sorry that's me, I get confused after a (long) day of work...
Sorry for the noise...
Le 29/01/2015 18:52, Benoit Tellier a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a distributed event system for the James mailbox ( so that
> IDLE imap command will work in a distributed environement ). Doing this,
> I am starting to write tests on top of the existing James event system
> and I notice this point :
>
> Listener per mailbox registration is not updated upon MailboxRenamed events.
>
> This implies that listeners do not receive any events after a
> mailboxRenamed event (not even this event).
>
> To solve this, we must trigger MailboxRenamed events in the event loop,
> and :
>
> - explicitly check from field with these kind of events, and notify clients
>
> - I do not know if we should still be connected in IDLE after a mailbox
> rename... rfc2177 is not clear about that,so I don't know if it makes
> sens to change the path listener are listening on (move listeners
> listening to the old path to the new path ).
>
> But I really think they should be notified about the mailboxRenamed event.
>
> What do you think of it?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org