You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by "James E. King III (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/03 03:43:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (THRIFT-883) Extend ByteBuffer support to non-array-backed ByteBuffers

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16732632#comment-16732632 ] 

James E. King III commented on THRIFT-883:
------------------------------------------

This has been inactive for 5 years.  If it still needs to be done great, otherwise close.

> Extend ByteBuffer support to non-array-backed ByteBuffers
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-883
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Java - Library
>    Affects Versions: 0.4
>            Reporter: Bryan Duxbury
>            Assignee: Bryan Duxbury
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: TBinaryProtocol-writeBinary.patch
>
>
> Binary fields are backed by ByteBuffers that wrap byte arrays, and all the protocol code assumes that every ByteBuffer is of this type. However, now that the structs setters allow ByteBuffer arguments, it would be nice to support other kinds of ByteBuffers, like those that are allocated direct.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)