Re: Final Release of LogKit?

[Peter Donald <do...@apache.org>]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:34, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > > Ah, as a side note: why are you guys always suggesting doing
> > > getLogger()? couldn't we make the logger variable of AbstractLoggable
> > > protected so that extending classes already have access to it and avoid
> > > making method calls to retrieve it? it's both easier and faster, but
> > > maybe you guys thought of something I'm forgetting, thus my questions.
> >
> > It is final so it will be inlined. Basically it is to avoid choosing the
> > variable name between m_logger and logger. Some people hate m_ ;)
>
> Ok, good enough.
>
> Please, if possible, make this evident in the documentation or people
> will percieve it as a speed problem.

okay - added a bit more of a blurb.

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

*--------------------------------------------------*
| Wise men don't need advice. Fools don't take it. |
|              -Benjamin Franklin                  |
*--------------------------------------------------*

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>