You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@arrow.apache.org by "Eduardo Ponce (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/12/27 01:05:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ARROW-14332) [C++] Rename type traits utilities to improve semantic consistency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-14332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Eduardo Ponce updated ARROW-14332:
----------------------------------
Description:
There are semantic differences between *enable_ifs-related* utils and *is_xxx* functions with the same name. For example, *is_binary_like* [here|[https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L596]] != [here|[https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L924]|https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L924]. The former includes binary only and the latter binary/string types.
Also, the *_like* suffix seems unwarranted as they always refer to binary or string.
Also, the *is_fixed_size_binary* includes both _FixedSizeBinaryType_ and {_}DecimalXXXType{_}. A better name is *is_base_fixed_size_binary* to match how binary/string utils are used.
{_}Note{_}: There might be other inconsistencies.
was:
There are semantic differences between *enable_ifs-related* utils and *is_xxx* functions with the same name. For example, *is_binary_like* [here](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L596) != [here](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L924). The former includes binary only and the latter binary/string types.
Also, the *_like* suffix seems unwarranted as they always refer to binary or string.
Also, the *is_fixed_size_binary* includes both _FixedSizeBinaryType_ and _DecimalXXXType_. A better name is *is_base_fixed_size_binary* to match how binary/string utils are used.
_Note_: There might be other inconsistencies.
> [C++] Rename type traits utilities to improve semantic consistency
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-14332
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-14332
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Eduardo Ponce
> Assignee: Eduardo Ponce
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: type
> Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>
> There are semantic differences between *enable_ifs-related* utils and *is_xxx* functions with the same name. For example, *is_binary_like* [here|[https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L596]] != [here|[https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L924]|https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L924]. The former includes binary only and the latter binary/string types.
> Also, the *_like* suffix seems unwarranted as they always refer to binary or string.
> Also, the *is_fixed_size_binary* includes both _FixedSizeBinaryType_ and {_}DecimalXXXType{_}. A better name is *is_base_fixed_size_binary* to match how binary/string utils are used.
> {_}Note{_}: There might be other inconsistencies.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)