You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Tyson Hamilton <ty...@google.com> on 2020/06/09 14:51:47 UTC
Remove EOL'd Runners
Hi All,
As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today or tomorrow.
-Tyson
[1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Tyson Hamilton <ty...@google.com>.
OK first PR up for Gearpump removal: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11960
If someone could run precommits that would be appreciated. One thing I'm unsure of is if there are any additional Jenkins configs outside the repo that need updating. I don't think there is but if anyone else knows please speak up.
On 2020/06/09 17:43:08, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> Thank you Tyson!
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Makes sense to me.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
> >>> unsupported runners.
> >>>
> >>> -Max
> >>>
> >>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> >>> > Hi All,
> >>> >
> >>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
> >>> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
> >>> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
> >>> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
> >>> or tomorrow.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Tyson
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]:
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org>.
I have "archived" the `runner-gearpump` Jira component. This makes it so
new issues cannot be associated. It can be unarchived any time. It does not
close or hide associated issues (makes sense: in Jira's data model, issues
are not "in" components, but associated with one or more)
Kenn
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tyson Hamilton <ty...@google.com> wrote:
> Sounds good, thanks.
>
> I removed Gearpump first and will move on to Apex later today. When that
> PR is merged we can clean up the Jenkins jobs in one swoop for both removed
> runners.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, 11:18 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> The jobs won't be deleted but will be disabled. I can help delete the
>> jobs from Jenkins once the jenkins configurations are removed either ping
>> me directly or update this thread when that should be done.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:38 AM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> All Jenkins configs are in the repo. There's a lag between merge and run
>>> of the "seed job" that syncs our configs. We can do a manual run of it, or
>>> just not worry about the temporary redness in the jobs that will be deleted
>>> anyhow.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> On 6/10/20 5:51 PM, David Morávek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Tyson!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>>>>>>>> unsupported runners.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Max
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex
>>>>>>>> and Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think
>>>>>>>> and didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in
>>>>>>>> the linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later
>>>>>>>> today or tomorrow.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > -Tyson
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [1]:
>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Tyson Hamilton <ty...@google.com>.
Sounds good, thanks.
I removed Gearpump first and will move on to Apex later today. When that PR
is merged we can clean up the Jenkins jobs in one swoop for both removed
runners.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, 11:18 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> The jobs won't be deleted but will be disabled. I can help delete the jobs
> from Jenkins once the jenkins configurations are removed either ping me
> directly or update this thread when that should be done.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:38 AM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> All Jenkins configs are in the repo. There's a lag between merge and run
>> of the "seed job" that syncs our configs. We can do a manual run of it, or
>> just not worry about the temporary redness in the jobs that will be deleted
>> anyhow.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> On 6/10/20 5:51 PM, David Morávek wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Tyson!
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>>>>>>> unsupported runners.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex
>>>>>>> and Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think
>>>>>>> and didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in
>>>>>>> the linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later
>>>>>>> today or tomorrow.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > -Tyson
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > [1]:
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com>.
The jobs won't be deleted but will be disabled. I can help delete the jobs
from Jenkins once the jenkins configurations are removed either ping me
directly or update this thread when that should be done.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:38 AM Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> All Jenkins configs are in the repo. There's a lag between merge and run
> of the "seed job" that syncs our configs. We can do a manual run of it, or
> just not worry about the temporary redness in the jobs that will be deleted
> anyhow.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> On 6/10/20 5:51 PM, David Morávek wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Tyson!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>>>>>> unsupported runners.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
>>>>>> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
>>>>>> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
>>>>>> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
>>>>>> or tomorrow.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > -Tyson
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1]:
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <ke...@apache.org>.
+1
All Jenkins configs are in the repo. There's a lag between merge and run of
the "seed job" that syncs our configs. We can do a manual run of it, or
just not worry about the temporary redness in the jobs that will be deleted
anyhow.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
> +1
> On 6/10/20 5:51 PM, David Morávek wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Tyson!
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>>>>> unsupported runners.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Max
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> > Hi All,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
>>>>> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
>>>>> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
>>>>> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
>>>>> or tomorrow.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Tyson
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1]:
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz>.
+1
On 6/10/20 5:51 PM, David Morávek wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com
> <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Thank you Tyson!
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw
> <robertwb@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels
> <mxm@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible
> decision to remove
> unsupported runners.
>
> -Max
>
> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd
> runners, Apex and Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999
> [2]. This will be a big PR I think and didn't want
> anyone to be surprised. There is already some
> agreement in the linked Jira issue. If there are no
> objections I'll get started later today or tomorrow.
> >
> > -Tyson
> >
> >
> > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
> >
>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by David Morávek <dm...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> Thank you Tyson!
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>>>> unsupported runners.
>>>>
>>>> -Max
>>>>
>>>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
>>>> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
>>>> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
>>>> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
>>>> or tomorrow.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Tyson
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > [1]:
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.
Thank you Tyson!
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:20 AM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>>> unsupported runners.
>>>
>>> -Max
>>>
>>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
>>> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
>>> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
>>> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
>>> or tomorrow.
>>> >
>>> > -Tyson
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [1]:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:
> Makes sense to me.
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
>> unsupported runners.
>>
>> -Max
>>
>> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
>> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
>> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
>> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
>> or tomorrow.
>> >
>> > -Tyson
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>> >
>>
>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>.
Makes sense to me.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 8:45 AM Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
> unsupported runners.
>
> -Max
>
> On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and
> Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and
> didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the
> linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today
> or tomorrow.
> >
> > -Tyson
> >
> >
> > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
> >
>
Re: Remove EOL'd Runners
Posted by Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>.
Thanks of the heads-up, Tyson! It's a sensible decision to remove
unsupported runners.
-Max
On 09.06.20 16:51, Tyson Hamilton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As part of the Fixit [1] I'd like to remove EOL'd runners, Apex and Gearpump, as described in BEAM-9999 [2]. This will be a big PR I think and didn't want anyone to be surprised. There is already some agreement in the linked Jira issue. If there are no objections I'll get started later today or tomorrow.
>
> -Tyson
>
>
> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9ddc77a8fee58ad02f68e2d9a7f054aab3e55717cc88ad1d5bc49311%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9999
>