You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> on 2022/06/01 03:20:34 UTC
Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha or
beta release?
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote. I'm okay
> with creating a beta release later this week. When we're ready to do
> that, we can just create that release candidate and vote on that,
> though.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think it would be
> > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time off for summer.
> > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch for new
> > features. This would be similar to what we did with the 2.0.0-alpha
> > releases [1]
> >
> > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main branch
> > released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> >
> > [1]: https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/
Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Yeah, maybe reconsider in about a week to let some outstanding work settle
a bit?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022, 19:16 dev1 <de...@etcoleman.com> wrote:
> There seems to be a few PRs that have mostly been resolved and need to be
> merged - the fate print command issues for one. I think we would be better
> off closing off open PRs before creating release candidates.
>
> Ed Coleman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 6:49 PM
> To: accumulo-dev <de...@accumulo.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
>
> Unfortunately, I won't be creating one tonight, though. Maybe tomorrow?
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:08 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I can create one.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 8:35 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Christopher, are you going to create a RC? Let me know if you can't
> > > and I can try to do something to get the release process moving.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 3:41 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes. I expect we'll do that when we prepare the RC for a beta.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:20 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha
> > > > > or beta release?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote.
> > > > > > I'm okay with creating a beta release later this week. When
> > > > > > we're ready to do that, we can just create that release
> > > > > > candidate and vote on that, though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller
> > > > > > <mm...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think
> > > > > > > it would
> > > > be
> > > > > > > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time
> > > > > > > off for
> > > > summer.
> > > > > > > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch
> > > > > > > for new features. This would be similar to what we did with
> > > > > > > the 2.0.0-alpha releases [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main
> > > > > > > branch released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/
> > > >
>
RE: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Posted by dev1 <de...@etcoleman.com>.
There seems to be a few PRs that have mostly been resolved and need to be merged - the fate print command issues for one. I think we would be better off closing off open PRs before creating release candidates.
Ed Coleman
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 6:49 PM
To: accumulo-dev <de...@accumulo.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Unfortunately, I won't be creating one tonight, though. Maybe tomorrow?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:08 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, I can create one.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 8:35 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Christopher, are you going to create a RC? Let me know if you can't
> > and I can try to do something to get the release process moving.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 3:41 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. I expect we'll do that when we prepare the RC for a beta.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:20 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha
> > > > or beta release?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote.
> > > > > I'm okay with creating a beta release later this week. When
> > > > > we're ready to do that, we can just create that release
> > > > > candidate and vote on that, though.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller
> > > > > <mm...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think
> > > > > > it would
> > > be
> > > > > > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time
> > > > > > off for
> > > summer.
> > > > > > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch
> > > > > > for new features. This would be similar to what we did with
> > > > > > the 2.0.0-alpha releases [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main
> > > > > > branch released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/
> > >
Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Unfortunately, I won't be creating one tonight, though. Maybe tomorrow?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:08 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, I can create one.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 8:35 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Christopher, are you going to create a RC? Let me know if you can't and I
> > can try to do something to get the release process moving.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 3:41 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. I expect we'll do that when we prepare the RC for a beta.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:20 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha or
> > > > beta release?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote. I'm okay
> > > > > with creating a beta release later this week. When we're ready to do
> > > > > that, we can just create that release candidate and vote on that,
> > > > > though.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think it would
> > > be
> > > > > > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time off for
> > > summer.
> > > > > > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch for new
> > > > > > features. This would be similar to what we did with the 2.0.0-alpha
> > > > > > releases [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main branch
> > > > > > released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]: https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/
> > >
Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Yes, I can create one.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 8:35 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Christopher, are you going to create a RC? Let me know if you can't and I
> can try to do something to get the release process moving.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 3:41 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes. I expect we'll do that when we prepare the RC for a beta.
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:20 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha or
> > > beta release?
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote. I'm okay
> > > > with creating a beta release later this week. When we're ready to do
> > > > that, we can just create that release candidate and vote on that,
> > > > though.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think it would
> > be
> > > > > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time off for
> > summer.
> > > > > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch for new
> > > > > features. This would be similar to what we did with the 2.0.0-alpha
> > > > > releases [1]
> > > > >
> > > > > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main branch
> > > > > released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/
> >
Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Posted by Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org>.
Christopher, are you going to create a RC? Let me know if you can't and I
can try to do something to get the release process moving.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 3:41 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes. I expect we'll do that when we prepare the RC for a beta.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:20 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha or
> > beta release?
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote. I'm okay
> > > with creating a beta release later this week. When we're ready to do
> > > that, we can just create that release candidate and vote on that,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think it would
> be
> > > > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time off for
> summer.
> > > > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch for new
> > > > features. This would be similar to what we did with the 2.0.0-alpha
> > > > releases [1]
> > > >
> > > > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main branch
> > > > released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1 Release
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Yes. I expect we'll do that when we prepare the RC for a beta.
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:20 PM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
>
> Should we also create a new 2.1 branch along with doing an alpha or
> beta release?
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:24 AM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure it makes sense to vote on whether to do a vote. I'm okay
> > with creating a beta release later this week. When we're ready to do
> > that, we can just create that release candidate and vote on that,
> > though.
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:12 AM Mike Miller <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I propose a vote to do a 2.1.0-beta-1 release ASAP. I think it would be
> > > advantageous to do a release before folks start taking time off for summer.
> > > This would allow better testing and free up the main branch for new
> > > features. This would be similar to what we did with the 2.0.0-alpha
> > > releases [1]
> > >
> > > My vote is +1 to do a release this week (or next week). Main branch
> > > released as 2.1.0-beta-1 or 2.1.0-alpha-1
> > >
> > > [1]: https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-2.0.0-alpha-1/